Sixty seconds on . . . vitamin D
What did NICE say? NICE’s summary, which looked specifically at emerging evidence on the role of vitamin D in relation to covid-19, concluded that there is currently no evidence to support supplements reducing the risk or severity of covid-19.2 The Scientific Advisory Commission on Nutrition also st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2020-10, Vol.371, p.m3872-m3872 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | What did NICE say? NICE’s summary, which looked specifically at emerging evidence on the role of vitamin D in relation to covid-19, concluded that there is currently no evidence to support supplements reducing the risk or severity of covid-19.2 The Scientific Advisory Commission on Nutrition also studied whether vitamin D supplementation could reduce the risk of acute respiratory tract infections other than covid-19, and concluded that the jury was still out.3 Any more bones you can throw me? Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.m3872 |