Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody testing by indirect immunofluorescence: Computer-aided versus conventional microscopic evaluation of routine diagnostic samples from patients with vasculitis or other inflammatory diseases

•ANCA IFA is a method for choice for inflammatory diseases other than vasculitides.•Automatic IFA testing is a reliable alternative of classical microscopic evaluation.•EUROPattern negative samples are also negative by conventional evaluation.•EUROPattern positive sera needs on-screen verification b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinica chimica acta 2020-12, Vol.511, p.117-124
Hauptverfasser: Nagy, Gábor, Csípő, István, Tarr, Tünde, Szűcs, Gabriella, Szántó, Antónia, Bubán, Tamás, Sipeki, Nóra, Szekanecz, Zoltán, Papp, Mária, Kappelmayer, János, Antal-Szalmás, Péter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•ANCA IFA is a method for choice for inflammatory diseases other than vasculitides.•Automatic IFA testing is a reliable alternative of classical microscopic evaluation.•EUROPattern negative samples are also negative by conventional evaluation.•EUROPattern positive sera needs on-screen verification by trained personnel.•Automated microscopes make the workflow of IFAs quicker, easier and more reliable. Detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) by indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFA) is of diagnostic importance in vasculitides and some other inflammatory diseases. Automation of IFA may be beneficial in high-throughput clinical laboratories. An analytical appraisal of the EUROPattern (EPa) automated microscope and image analysis system has not been reported in a routine clinical laboratory setting testing samples from both vasculitis and non-vasculitis patients. Results of EPa and on-screen ANCA pattern recognition of 568 consecutive routine serum samples were compared to those of conventional visual evaluation. Agreement of discrimination between negative and non-negative samples was 86.1% comparing EPa and conventional reading, and it increased to 96.7% after on-screen user validation. Importantly, from the 334 samples classified as negative by EPa 328 (98.2%) were also negative by conventional evaluation. Pattern recognition showed ‘moderate’ agreement between classical microscopic and EPa analysis (κ = 0.446) and ‘very good’ agreement after user validation (κ = 0.900). Misclassification by EPa was dominantly due to the presence of anti-nuclear/cytoplasmic antibodies (incorrect pattern, 80/568) and the lower fluorescence cut-off of the automated microscope (false positives, 73/568). Automated ANCA testing by EPa is a reliable alternative of classical microscopic evaluation, though classification of sera needs correction by trained personnel during on-screen validation.
ISSN:0009-8981
1873-3492
DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.031