The Effect of Trauma Center Verification Level on Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Undergoing Interfacility Transfer

Background Previous literature demonstrates increased mortality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) with transfer to a Level II versus Level I trauma center. Our objective was to determine the effect of the most recent American College of Surgeons–Committee on Trauma (ACS‐COT) “Resources for the Optima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2021-03, Vol.28 (3), p.292-299
Hauptverfasser: Plurad, David S., Geesman, Glenn, Mahmoud, Ahmed, Sheets, Nicholas, Chawla‐Kondal, Bhani, Ayutyanont, Napatkamon, Ghostine, Samer, Guldner, Gregory, Huff, J. Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Previous literature demonstrates increased mortality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) with transfer to a Level II versus Level I trauma center. Our objective was to determine the effect of the most recent American College of Surgeons–Committee on Trauma (ACS‐COT) “Resources for the Optimal Care of the Injured Patient” resources manual (“The Orange Book”) on outcomes after severe TBI after interfacility transfer to Level I versus Level II center. Methods Utilizing the Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File of the American College of Surgeons admission year 2017, we identified patients with isolated TBI undergoing interfacility transfer to either Level I or Level II trauma center. Logistic regression was performed to determine independent associations with mortality. Results There were 10,268 (71.6%) transferred to a Level I center and 4,025 (28.4%) were transferred to a Level II center. They were mostly male (61.4%) with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 20.8 years. Mean Injury Severity Score was 16.3 ± 6.3 and most were injured in a single‐level fall (51.5%). Patients transferred to a Level I center were less likely to be White (82.3% vs. 84.7%, 0.002) and more likely to have sustained penetrating trauma (2.7% vs. 1.6%,
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/acem.14145