Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology
The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the (5th ed.; ) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 2021-01, Vol.33 (1), p.84-89 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Psychological assessment |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Quilty, Lena C Bagby, R Michael Krueger, Robert F Pollock, Bruce G |
description | The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the
(5th ed.;
) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date, the psychometric properties of the
Section III clinician-rated measures have received limited investigation. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the convergence between self-report and clinician-rated measures of
personality pathology in a diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric patient sample. A total of 201 outpatients with current psychiatric symptoms were recruited from a psychiatric hospital patient research registry. Participants completed both clinician-rated and self-reported measures of personality pathology. Self-reported personality traits converged with clinician-rated personality traits, with medium to large effect sizes. Current and Section III personality disorder criteria demonstrated significant convergence, most with medium to large effect sizes. Self-reported and clinician-rated personality impairment correlated with small to medium effect sizes. The current investigation incorporates a multi-informant assessment of personality in a psychiatric outpatient sample. These results provide evidence for the validity of the scores of the clinician-rated instruments used to implement this model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pas0000960 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2445970923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2445591477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-5fbc019f99d099a41b1e2be2ef81721e48a849ff06e18025deab28e2326f70103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLxDAQAOAgiq6rF3-AFLyIUJ282uQo6_qAFQ8-8FbSdqKVblOT9rD_3iy-wIMDYXL4MsxkCDmgcEqB52e9CRBDZ7BBJlRznVIunjfjHQSkXGrYIbshvAFQwZXcJjuc6UxnOZ2Q-ZNpm9oMjesSZ5OL-9tUJlXbdE3VmC71ZsA6WaIJo8ewFj364Lr4aFglvRleXeteVntky5o24P5XnpLHy_nD7Dpd3F3dzM4XacUFH1JpywqotlrXoLURtKTISmRoFc0ZRaGMEtpayJAqYLJGUzKFjLPM5hBnnZLjz7q9d-8jhqFYNqHCtjUdujEUTAipc9CMR3r0h7650cfG10qpeKTS_yshpaYiz6M6-VSVdyF4tEXvm6Xxq4JCsV5B8buCiA-_So7lEusf-v3n_AOspn7Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2445591477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Quilty, Lena C ; Bagby, R Michael ; Krueger, Robert F ; Pollock, Bruce G</creator><creatorcontrib>Quilty, Lena C ; Bagby, R Michael ; Krueger, Robert F ; Pollock, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><description>The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the
(5th ed.;
) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date, the psychometric properties of the
Section III clinician-rated measures have received limited investigation. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the convergence between self-report and clinician-rated measures of
personality pathology in a diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric patient sample. A total of 201 outpatients with current psychiatric symptoms were recruited from a psychiatric hospital patient research registry. Participants completed both clinician-rated and self-reported measures of personality pathology. Self-reported personality traits converged with clinician-rated personality traits, with medium to large effect sizes. Current and Section III personality disorder criteria demonstrated significant convergence, most with medium to large effect sizes. Self-reported and clinician-rated personality impairment correlated with small to medium effect sizes. The current investigation incorporates a multi-informant assessment of personality in a psychiatric outpatient sample. These results provide evidence for the validity of the scores of the clinician-rated instruments used to implement this model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0000960</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32969671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinicians ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Middle Aged ; Outpatient ; Outpatients ; Personality ; Personality Disorders ; Personality Disorders - diagnosis ; Personality Measures ; Personality Traits ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychometrics ; Psychopathology ; Self Report ; Test Validity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2021-01, Vol.33 (1), p.84-89</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-5fbc019f99d099a41b1e2be2ef81721e48a849ff06e18025deab28e2326f70103</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0802-3998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32969671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quilty, Lena C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagby, R Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the
(5th ed.;
) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date, the psychometric properties of the
Section III clinician-rated measures have received limited investigation. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the convergence between self-report and clinician-rated measures of
personality pathology in a diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric patient sample. A total of 201 outpatients with current psychiatric symptoms were recruited from a psychiatric hospital patient research registry. Participants completed both clinician-rated and self-reported measures of personality pathology. Self-reported personality traits converged with clinician-rated personality traits, with medium to large effect sizes. Current and Section III personality disorder criteria demonstrated significant convergence, most with medium to large effect sizes. Self-reported and clinician-rated personality impairment correlated with small to medium effect sizes. The current investigation incorporates a multi-informant assessment of personality in a psychiatric outpatient sample. These results provide evidence for the validity of the scores of the clinician-rated instruments used to implement this model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinicians</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outpatient</subject><subject>Outpatients</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Disorders</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90UtLxDAQAOAgiq6rF3-AFLyIUJ282uQo6_qAFQ8-8FbSdqKVblOT9rD_3iy-wIMDYXL4MsxkCDmgcEqB52e9CRBDZ7BBJlRznVIunjfjHQSkXGrYIbshvAFQwZXcJjuc6UxnOZ2Q-ZNpm9oMjesSZ5OL-9tUJlXbdE3VmC71ZsA6WaIJo8ewFj364Lr4aFglvRleXeteVntky5o24P5XnpLHy_nD7Dpd3F3dzM4XacUFH1JpywqotlrXoLURtKTISmRoFc0ZRaGMEtpayJAqYLJGUzKFjLPM5hBnnZLjz7q9d-8jhqFYNqHCtjUdujEUTAipc9CMR3r0h7650cfG10qpeKTS_yshpaYiz6M6-VSVdyF4tEXvm6Xxq4JCsV5B8buCiA-_So7lEusf-v3n_AOspn7Z</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Quilty, Lena C</creator><creator>Bagby, R Michael</creator><creator>Krueger, Robert F</creator><creator>Pollock, Bruce G</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0802-3998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology</title><author>Quilty, Lena C ; Bagby, R Michael ; Krueger, Robert F ; Pollock, Bruce G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-5fbc019f99d099a41b1e2be2ef81721e48a849ff06e18025deab28e2326f70103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinicians</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outpatient</topic><topic>Outpatients</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Disorders</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quilty, Lena C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagby, R Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quilty, Lena C</au><au>Bagby, R Michael</au><au>Krueger, Robert F</au><au>Pollock, Bruce G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>84-89</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the
(5th ed.;
) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date, the psychometric properties of the
Section III clinician-rated measures have received limited investigation. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the convergence between self-report and clinician-rated measures of
personality pathology in a diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric patient sample. A total of 201 outpatients with current psychiatric symptoms were recruited from a psychiatric hospital patient research registry. Participants completed both clinician-rated and self-reported measures of personality pathology. Self-reported personality traits converged with clinician-rated personality traits, with medium to large effect sizes. Current and Section III personality disorder criteria demonstrated significant convergence, most with medium to large effect sizes. Self-reported and clinician-rated personality impairment correlated with small to medium effect sizes. The current investigation incorporates a multi-informant assessment of personality in a psychiatric outpatient sample. These results provide evidence for the validity of the scores of the clinician-rated instruments used to implement this model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>32969671</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0000960</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0802-3998</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
ispartof | Psychological assessment, 2021-01, Vol.33 (1), p.84-89 |
issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2445970923 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Clinicians Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Female Human Humans Male Mental disorders Middle Aged Outpatient Outpatients Personality Personality Disorders Personality Disorders - diagnosis Personality Measures Personality Traits Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychometrics Psychopathology Self Report Test Validity Young Adult |
title | Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20DSM-5%20clinician-rated%20measures%20of%20personality%20pathology&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Quilty,%20Lena%20C&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=84-89&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0000960&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2445591477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2445591477&rft_id=info:pmid/32969671&rfr_iscdi=true |