Looking Beyond the Numbers: Increasing Diversity and Inclusion Through Holistic Review in General Surgery Recruitment

The purpose of this study is the examine the effect of a holistic review process on the recruitment of women and students underrepresented in medicine (UIM) in a general surgery residency program. A retrospective study comparing the proportion of women and UIM students ranked and matched into catego...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical education 2021-05, Vol.78 (3), p.763-769
Hauptverfasser: Nehemiah, Ariel, Roberts, Sanford E., Song, Yun, Kelz, Rachel R., Butler, Paris D., Morris, Jon B., Aarons, Cary B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study is the examine the effect of a holistic review process on the recruitment of women and students underrepresented in medicine (UIM) in a general surgery residency program. A retrospective study comparing the proportion of women and UIM students ranked and matched into categorical positions from 2013 to 2020 before and after the implementation of the holistic application review process. United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores and American Board of Surgery In-training Exam (ABSITE) scores were also compared between groups. General Surgery residency program at a tertiary, academic center. Medical students applying for and matriculated to categorical positions. After the implementation of holistic review in 2017, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of women (42% vs. 61%, p < 0.01) and UIM students (14% vs. 20%, p = 0.046) ranked in our program compared with the prior “traditional” approach. The proportion of matched female (33% vs. 54%, p = 0.11) and UIM applicants (14% vs. 21%, p = 0.48) also increased after holistic review, although the changes were not statistically significant. The median USMLE Step 1 scores were equivalent for both ranked (250 vs. 250, p = 0.81) and matched (250 vs. 249, p = 0.32) applicants before and after the intervention. The median ABSITE scores for the matched intern classes was lower after initiation of holistic review (519 vs. 483, p = 0.01). However, these scores were consistently above the national medians and subgroup analysis showed no difference between the median aggregate ABSITE scores for UIM and female categorical interns and non-UIM males (475 vs. 520, p = 0.09). Increasing emphasis is being placed on the diversification of residency training to reflect an expanding, diverse patient population. The incorporation of a holistic review process, providing broader assessment of applicants, can play a pivotal role in increasing the proportion of women and UIM students represented in the general surgery recruitment process.
ISSN:1931-7204
1878-7452
DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.048