Timing of Ablation and Prognosis of Patients With Electrical Storm and Scar-Related Left Ventricular Dysfunction
•In ES due to monomorphic VT, RFCA was associated with a better survival at 30 days.•Compared with medical treatment, RFCA reduced mortality from arrhythmia by 66%.•Only patients ablated >48 hours after admission benefited from RFCA.•Support with ECMO was associated with better RFCA results. Alth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2020-12, Vol.136, p.87-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •In ES due to monomorphic VT, RFCA was associated with a better survival at 30 days.•Compared with medical treatment, RFCA reduced mortality from arrhythmia by 66%.•Only patients ablated >48 hours after admission benefited from RFCA.•Support with ECMO was associated with better RFCA results.
Although radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is indicated in electrical storm (ES) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, its most appropriate timing has not been determined. Our objective is to analyse the impact of the timing of RFCA on 30-day mortality in patients with ES and previous scar-related systolic dysfunction. In this multi-centre study, we analysed 104 patients (age: 72 ± 10, left ventricular ejection fraction: 30 ± 6%) attended consecutively due to an ES caused by monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Sixty-four subjects were treated with RFCA (mean time from admission = 83 ± 67 hours) and 40 were not. Upon admission 25 (24%) individuals had severe heart failure. Mortality rate at 30 days was 24 (23%) patients. RFCA was associated with a reduction of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio = 0.2; p = 0.008). After showing a positive correlation between the time of the RFCA (hours) and survival at 30 days (C-statistic = 0.77; p 48 hours after admission had lower mortality at 30 days than those treated conservatively: 38% (no RFCA) versus 30% (RFCA ≤48 hours) versus 7% (RFCA >48 hours) (adjusted hazard ratio for RFCA >48 hours vs others = 0.2; p = 0.007). Among the patients ablated, those who were non-inducible had lower 30-day mortality: 8% versus 29% (p = 0.03). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with a higher rate of non-inducibility in RFCA >48 hours (100% vs 76%; p = 0.03), but not in RFCA ≤48 hours (60% vs 60%; p = 1). In conclusion, among high-risk patients with ES, RFCA performed >48 hours after admission is associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality. In such subjects, the probability of successful RFCA increases when performed under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.010 |