The effect of numbers of noise events on people's reactions to noise - An analysis of existing survey data

Even though there are surveys in which annoyance decreases as the number of events increases above about 150 a day, the available evidence is not considered strong enough to reject the conventional assumption that reactions are related to the logarithm of the number of events. The data do not make it possible to reject the conventional assumption that the effects of the number of events and the peak noise level are additive. It is found that even when equivalent questionnaire items and definitions of noise events could be used, differences between the surveys' estimates of the effect of the number of events remained large. Three explanations are suggested for inconsistent estimates. The first has to do with errors in specifying the values of noise parameters, the second with the effects of unmeasured acoustical and area characteristics that are correlated with noise level or number, and the third with large sampling errors deriving from community differences in response to noise. It is concluded that significant advances in the knowledge about the effects of the number of noise events can be made only if surveys include large numbers of study areas.