When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist

Replication is an essential part of the scientific method, yet replication of systematic reviews is too often overlooked, and done unnecessarily or poorly. Excessive replication (doing the same study repeatedly) is unethical and a cause of research wastage. This article provides consensus based guid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2020-09, Vol.370, p.m2864-m2864
Hauptverfasser: Tugwell, Peter, Welch, Vivian Andrea, Karunananthan, Sathya, Maxwell, Lara J, Akl, Elie A, Avey, Marc T, Bhutta, Zulfiqar A, Brouwers, Melissa C, Clark, Jocalyn P, Cook, Sophie, Cuervo, Luis Gabriel, Curran, Janet Agnes, Ghogomu, Elizabeth Tanjong, Graham, Ian G, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Hutton, Brian, Ioannidis, John P A, Jordan, Zoe, Jull, Janet Elizabeth, Kristjansson, Elizabeth, Langlois, Etienne V, Little, Julian, Lyddiatt, Anne, Martin, Janet E, Marušić, Ana, Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, Moher, David, Morton, Rachael L, Nasser, Mona, Page, Matthew J, Pardo Pardo, Jordi, Petkovic, Jennifer, Petticrew, Mark, Pigott, Terri, Pottie, Kevin, Rada, Gabriel, Rader, Tamara, Riddle, Alison Y, Rothstein, Hannah, Schüneman, Holger J, Shamseer, Larissa, Shea, Beverley J, Simeon, Rosiane, Siontis, Konstantinos C, Smith, Maureen, Soares-Weiser, Karla, Thavorn, Kednapa, Tovey, David, Vachon, Brigitte, Valentine, Jeffery, Villemaire, Rebecca, Walker, Peter, Weeks, Laura, Wells, George, Wilson, David B, White, Howard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Replication is an essential part of the scientific method, yet replication of systematic reviews is too often overlooked, and done unnecessarily or poorly. Excessive replication (doing the same study repeatedly) is unethical and a cause of research wastage. This article provides consensus based guidance on when to replicate and not replicate systematic reviews.
ISSN:1756-1833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.m2864