Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.912-923
Hauptverfasser: Suzuki, Toshinari, Koyama, Kaoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 923
container_issue 6
container_start_page 912
container_title Journal of anesthesia
container_volume 34
creator Suzuki, Toshinari
Koyama, Kaoru
description Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee as a single center, open-labeled randomized trial. Fifty patients undergoing hepatic or pancreatic surgery were randomly assigned to the HES group ( n  = 25), who received HES 130/0.4/9, or the Albumin group ( n  = 25), who received 5% albumin. Ringer’s acetate solution (3 ml/kg/h) and colloid solution (2 mL/kg/h) were infused and goal-directed fluid management was performed to stabilize hemodynamics. Perioperative changes and differences in serum creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), hemodynamics, coagulation parameters and glycocalyx biomarkers were compared between the groups. Blood loss and requirements for transfusion and vasoactive agents were also examined. Statistical analysis was performed by Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440902081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651154207</galeid><sourcerecordid>A651154207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-12f103d557ffc9dfaa6d6bc87971fe49d1fcd1c918c4b4bc71140446689956d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rHCEUhofS0mzT_oFeFKEEepHZ1dH58DKE9AMCuWmvxdHj7gRHtzoTYn9Zf17cnbRQWIqIHnzeF89HUbwneE0wbjcR45rhEleH3bG2TC-KFWG0Kzta85fFCnNCy65purPiTYz3GOOGEPq6OKNVx1tG21Xx-24PDgXptB-HX6DRFAZpkTdo2gECY0BN8RA2F2iXdPCPCaZdsihOMqgdIhRv8JptOMoWqL5A0vbzODjkHYrSwJTQPngzWLhED97O49F0UFKly6Nka5PyStr0iDRsg9RyGrI2O-xgn-_qSO2lUwGOYZzDFkJ6W7wy0kZ493yeFz8-33y__lre3n35dn11W6q64VNJKkMw1XXdGqO4NlI2uulV1_KWGGBcE6M0UZx0ivWsVy0hDDOWa8Z53WhKz4tPi29O4-cMcRLjEBVYKx34OYqKMcxzCzqS0Y8LupUWxOCMn4JUB1xcNTUhNatwm6nyBLUFB0Fa7-BQq3_59Qk-Lw3joE4KqkWggo8xgBH7MIwyJEGwOAyOWAZH5F-L4-CIlEUfntOc-xH0X8mfSckAXYCYn1zugLj3c3C59P-zfQLYQs4x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440902081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><creator>Suzuki, Toshinari ; Koyama, Kaoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshinari ; Koyama, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee as a single center, open-labeled randomized trial. Fifty patients undergoing hepatic or pancreatic surgery were randomly assigned to the HES group ( n  = 25), who received HES 130/0.4/9, or the Albumin group ( n  = 25), who received 5% albumin. Ringer’s acetate solution (3 ml/kg/h) and colloid solution (2 mL/kg/h) were infused and goal-directed fluid management was performed to stabilize hemodynamics. Perioperative changes and differences in serum creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), hemodynamics, coagulation parameters and glycocalyx biomarkers were compared between the groups. Blood loss and requirements for transfusion and vasoactive agents were also examined. Statistical analysis was performed by Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P  &lt; 0.05 taken to be significant. Results Serum creatinine levels did not differ between the HES and Albumin groups (median: 0.67 vs. 0.75 mg/dL at anesthesia induction, 0.82 vs. 0.83 mg/dL at ICU admission, 0.67 vs. 0.73 mg/dL one day after surgery, 0.68 vs. 0.70 mg/dL one month after surgery). NAG, coagulation parameters, hemodynamics, glycocalyx biomarkers, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and use of vasoactive agents did not differ between the groups. Conclusion HES 130/0.4/9 can be used as safely and effectively as 5% albumin. Glycocalyx degradation did not differ between use of these solutions in major abdominal surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0913-8668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32897437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Albumin ; Albumins ; Anesthesiology ; Comparative analysis ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Fluid Therapy ; Glycocalyx ; Humans ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives ; Intensive ; Isotonic Solutions ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Plasma Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Journal of anesthesia, 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.912-923</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-12f103d557ffc9dfaa6d6bc87971fe49d1fcd1c918c4b4bc71140446689956d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-12f103d557ffc9dfaa6d6bc87971fe49d1fcd1c918c4b4bc71140446689956d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshinari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><title>Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery</title><title>Journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee as a single center, open-labeled randomized trial. Fifty patients undergoing hepatic or pancreatic surgery were randomly assigned to the HES group ( n  = 25), who received HES 130/0.4/9, or the Albumin group ( n  = 25), who received 5% albumin. Ringer’s acetate solution (3 ml/kg/h) and colloid solution (2 mL/kg/h) were infused and goal-directed fluid management was performed to stabilize hemodynamics. Perioperative changes and differences in serum creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), hemodynamics, coagulation parameters and glycocalyx biomarkers were compared between the groups. Blood loss and requirements for transfusion and vasoactive agents were also examined. Statistical analysis was performed by Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P  &lt; 0.05 taken to be significant. Results Serum creatinine levels did not differ between the HES and Albumin groups (median: 0.67 vs. 0.75 mg/dL at anesthesia induction, 0.82 vs. 0.83 mg/dL at ICU admission, 0.67 vs. 0.73 mg/dL one day after surgery, 0.68 vs. 0.70 mg/dL one month after surgery). NAG, coagulation parameters, hemodynamics, glycocalyx biomarkers, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and use of vasoactive agents did not differ between the groups. Conclusion HES 130/0.4/9 can be used as safely and effectively as 5% albumin. Glycocalyx degradation did not differ between use of these solutions in major abdominal surgery.</description><subject>Albumin</subject><subject>Albumins</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy</subject><subject>Glycocalyx</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Plasma Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0913-8668</issn><issn>1438-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rHCEUhofS0mzT_oFeFKEEepHZ1dH58DKE9AMCuWmvxdHj7gRHtzoTYn9Zf17cnbRQWIqIHnzeF89HUbwneE0wbjcR45rhEleH3bG2TC-KFWG0Kzta85fFCnNCy65purPiTYz3GOOGEPq6OKNVx1tG21Xx-24PDgXptB-HX6DRFAZpkTdo2gECY0BN8RA2F2iXdPCPCaZdsihOMqgdIhRv8JptOMoWqL5A0vbzODjkHYrSwJTQPngzWLhED97O49F0UFKly6Nka5PyStr0iDRsg9RyGrI2O-xgn-_qSO2lUwGOYZzDFkJ6W7wy0kZ493yeFz8-33y__lre3n35dn11W6q64VNJKkMw1XXdGqO4NlI2uulV1_KWGGBcE6M0UZx0ivWsVy0hDDOWa8Z53WhKz4tPi29O4-cMcRLjEBVYKx34OYqKMcxzCzqS0Y8LupUWxOCMn4JUB1xcNTUhNatwm6nyBLUFB0Fa7-BQq3_59Qk-Lw3joE4KqkWggo8xgBH7MIwyJEGwOAyOWAZH5F-L4-CIlEUfntOc-xH0X8mfSckAXYCYn1zugLj3c3C59P-zfQLYQs4x</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Suzuki, Toshinari</creator><creator>Koyama, Kaoru</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery</title><author>Suzuki, Toshinari ; Koyama, Kaoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-12f103d557ffc9dfaa6d6bc87971fe49d1fcd1c918c4b4bc71140446689956d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Albumin</topic><topic>Albumins</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy</topic><topic>Glycocalyx</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Plasma Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshinari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suzuki, Toshinari</au><au>Koyama, Kaoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>J Anesth</stitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>912</spage><epage>923</epage><pages>912-923</pages><issn>0913-8668</issn><eissn>1438-8359</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee as a single center, open-labeled randomized trial. Fifty patients undergoing hepatic or pancreatic surgery were randomly assigned to the HES group ( n  = 25), who received HES 130/0.4/9, or the Albumin group ( n  = 25), who received 5% albumin. Ringer’s acetate solution (3 ml/kg/h) and colloid solution (2 mL/kg/h) were infused and goal-directed fluid management was performed to stabilize hemodynamics. Perioperative changes and differences in serum creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), hemodynamics, coagulation parameters and glycocalyx biomarkers were compared between the groups. Blood loss and requirements for transfusion and vasoactive agents were also examined. Statistical analysis was performed by Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P  &lt; 0.05 taken to be significant. Results Serum creatinine levels did not differ between the HES and Albumin groups (median: 0.67 vs. 0.75 mg/dL at anesthesia induction, 0.82 vs. 0.83 mg/dL at ICU admission, 0.67 vs. 0.73 mg/dL one day after surgery, 0.68 vs. 0.70 mg/dL one month after surgery). NAG, coagulation parameters, hemodynamics, glycocalyx biomarkers, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and use of vasoactive agents did not differ between the groups. Conclusion HES 130/0.4/9 can be used as safely and effectively as 5% albumin. Glycocalyx degradation did not differ between use of these solutions in major abdominal surgery.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>32897437</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0913-8668
ispartof Journal of anesthesia, 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.912-923
issn 0913-8668
1438-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440902081
source MEDLINE; Springer Journals
subjects Albumin
Albumins
Anesthesiology
Comparative analysis
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Fluid Therapy
Glycocalyx
Humans
Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives
Intensive
Isotonic Solutions
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Plasma Substitutes - therapeutic use
title Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A28%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open%20randomized%20trial%20of%20the%20effects%20of%206%25%20hydroxyethyl%20starch%20130/0.4/9%20and%205%25%20albumin%20on%20safety%20profile,%20volume%20efficacy,%20and%20glycocalyx%20degradation%20in%20hepatic%20and%20pancreatic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=Suzuki,%20Toshinari&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=912&rft.epage=923&rft.pages=912-923&rft.issn=0913-8668&rft.eissn=1438-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651154207%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440902081&rft_id=info:pmid/32897437&rft_galeid=A651154207&rfr_iscdi=true