Open randomized trial of the effects of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4/9 and 5% albumin on safety profile, volume efficacy, and glycocalyx degradation in hepatic and pancreatic surgery

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 2020-12, Vol.34 (6), p.912-923
Hauptverfasser: Suzuki, Toshinari, Koyama, Kaoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4/9 compared to 5% albumin on renal and coagulation safety profiles, volume efficacy and glycocalyx degradation in major abdominal surgery. Methods The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee as a single center, open-labeled randomized trial. Fifty patients undergoing hepatic or pancreatic surgery were randomly assigned to the HES group ( n  = 25), who received HES 130/0.4/9, or the Albumin group ( n  = 25), who received 5% albumin. Ringer’s acetate solution (3 ml/kg/h) and colloid solution (2 mL/kg/h) were infused and goal-directed fluid management was performed to stabilize hemodynamics. Perioperative changes and differences in serum creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), hemodynamics, coagulation parameters and glycocalyx biomarkers were compared between the groups. Blood loss and requirements for transfusion and vasoactive agents were also examined. Statistical analysis was performed by Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P  
ISSN:0913-8668
1438-8359
DOI:10.1007/s00540-020-02847-y