UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire study: comparisons between cosmetic shell and artificial eye users. Part 1: demographics, comfort and satisfaction

AimsTo compare the unique experiences related to artificial eye (AE) versus cosmetic shell (CS) wear.MethodsIn this observational, cross-sectional study, the National Artificial Eye Questionnaire (NAEQ) was employed nationwide within the National Health Service England. The proportions or mean value...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2021-10, Vol.105 (10), p.1346-1351
Hauptverfasser: Shapira, Yinon, Worrell, Emma, Ullrich, Katja, Litwin, Andre, Malhotra, Raman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AimsTo compare the unique experiences related to artificial eye (AE) versus cosmetic shell (CS) wear.MethodsIn this observational, cross-sectional study, the National Artificial Eye Questionnaire (NAEQ) was employed nationwide within the National Health Service England. The proportions or mean values of the aetiology of sight or eye loss, demographics, length of prosthesis wear, reported adjustment time to the prosthesis, comfort, discharge and satisfaction of appearance were compared between AE and CS respondents.ResultsOverall, 951 respondents wore an AE, while 238 wore a CS. In both, trauma was the leading cause for the prosthesis (47.6% and 44.1%, respectively); however, these groups differed in the proportions of the other aetiologies (p
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317015