UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire study: comparisons between cosmetic shell and artificial eye users. Part 1: demographics, comfort and satisfaction
AimsTo compare the unique experiences related to artificial eye (AE) versus cosmetic shell (CS) wear.MethodsIn this observational, cross-sectional study, the National Artificial Eye Questionnaire (NAEQ) was employed nationwide within the National Health Service England. The proportions or mean value...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2021-10, Vol.105 (10), p.1346-1351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | AimsTo compare the unique experiences related to artificial eye (AE) versus cosmetic shell (CS) wear.MethodsIn this observational, cross-sectional study, the National Artificial Eye Questionnaire (NAEQ) was employed nationwide within the National Health Service England. The proportions or mean values of the aetiology of sight or eye loss, demographics, length of prosthesis wear, reported adjustment time to the prosthesis, comfort, discharge and satisfaction of appearance were compared between AE and CS respondents.ResultsOverall, 951 respondents wore an AE, while 238 wore a CS. In both, trauma was the leading cause for the prosthesis (47.6% and 44.1%, respectively); however, these groups differed in the proportions of the other aetiologies (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317015 |