Comparison of short‐term light disturbance, optical and visual performance outcomes between a myopia control contact lens and a single‐vision contact lens
Purpose To compare the optical and visual performance of a dual‐focus (DF) contact lens used for myopia control with a single‐vision (SV) contact lens of the same material. Methods A randomised, double‐masked crossover study. Twenty‐eight healthy, myopic volunteers between 18 and 32 years of age (23...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2020-11, Vol.40 (6), p.718-727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To compare the optical and visual performance of a dual‐focus (DF) contact lens used for myopia control with a single‐vision (SV) contact lens of the same material.
Methods
A randomised, double‐masked crossover study. Twenty‐eight healthy, myopic volunteers between 18 and 32 years of age (23.49 ± 4.07 years) participated in this study. The sensory dominant eye for distance vision was determined. Refraction, best‐corrected visual acuity (VA) and aberrations for 3 mm and 5 mm pupil diameters were quantified without a contact lens in situ. Subjects were fitted with two contact lens designs: DF and SV, both made of omafilcon A material. The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire, over‐refraction, best‐corrected VA, stereopsis at 40 cm, best‐corrected photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, light disturbance and aberrations were assessed 25 min after contact lens insertion.
Results
There were no statistically significant differences in best‐corrected VA and stereopsis between the baseline, DF and SV conditions. Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were lower for the DF contact lens at all frequencies, with the exception of the mesopic contrast sensitivity at 18 cycles per degree (p = 0.23). Higher order aberrations and light disturbance size and irregularity were higher for the DF contact lens (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0275-5408 1475-1313 |
DOI: | 10.1111/opo.12729 |