Screening Sweetpotato Genotypes for Resistance to a North Carolina Isolate of Meloidogyne enterolobii

Potential resistance to the guava root-knot nematode, , in 91 selected sweetpotato ( [L.] Lam.) genotypes was evaluated in six greenhouse experiments. Ten thousand eggs of were inoculated on each sweetpotato genotype grown in a 3:1 sand to soil mixture. Sixty days after inoculation, the percentage o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2021-04, Vol.105 (4), p.1101-1107
Hauptverfasser: Schwarz, Tanner R, Li, Chunying, Yencho, G Craig, Pecota, Kenneth V, Heim, Chris R, Davis, Eric L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Potential resistance to the guava root-knot nematode, , in 91 selected sweetpotato ( [L.] Lam.) genotypes was evaluated in six greenhouse experiments. Ten thousand eggs of were inoculated on each sweetpotato genotype grown in a 3:1 sand to soil mixture. Sixty days after inoculation, the percentage of total roots with nematode-induced galls was determined, and nematode eggs were extracted from roots. Significant differences ( < 0.001) between sweetpotato genotypes were found in all six tests for gall rating, total eggs, and eggs per gram of root. Resistant sweetpotato genotypes were calculated as final eggs per root system divided by the initial inoculum, where / < 1 (reproduction factor; final egg count divided by initial inoculum of 10,000 eggs), and statistical mean separations were confirmed by Fisher's least significant difference test. Our results indicated that 19 out of 91 tested sweetpotato genotypes were resistant to . Some of the susceptible genotypes included 'Covington,' 'Beauregard,' 'NCDM04-001', and 'Hernandez.' Some of the resistant sweetpotato genotypes included 'Tanzania,' 'Murasaki-29,' 'Bwanjule,' 'Dimbuka-Bukulula,' 'Jewel,' and 'Centennial.' Most of the 19 resistant sweetpotato genotypes supported almost no reproduction, with
ISSN:0191-2917
1943-7692
DOI:10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0389-RE