The effect of intravenous, intranasal, and oral ketamine in mood disorders: A meta-analysis

•Short-term efficacy of IV and IN ketamine/esketamine is established for TRD.•Interpretation the efficacy of oral ketamine in TRD is limited.•Insufficient data on disparate formulations and routes of delivery of ketamine. Ketamine is established as a rapid and effective treatment in adults with trea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2020-11, Vol.276, p.576-584
Hauptverfasser: McIntyre, Roger S., Carvalho, Isabelle P., Lui, Leanna M.W., Majeed, Amna, Masand, Prakash S., Gill, Hartej, Rodrigues, Nelson B., Lipsitz, Orly, Coles, Alexandria C., Lee, Yena, Tamura, Jocelyn K., Iacobucci, Michelle, Phan, Lee, Nasri, Flora, Singhal, Nikhita, Wong, Elizabeth R., Subramaniapillai, Mehala, Mansur, Rodrigo, Ho, Roger, Lam, Raymond W., Rosenblat, Joshua D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Short-term efficacy of IV and IN ketamine/esketamine is established for TRD.•Interpretation the efficacy of oral ketamine in TRD is limited.•Insufficient data on disparate formulations and routes of delivery of ketamine. Ketamine is established as a rapid and effective treatment in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The availability of different formulations and routes of delivery invites the need for evaluating relative effect sizes. Effect size with respect to depression symptom reduction for each formulation and route of delivery was compared at discrete time-points (i.e., 24 h, 2–6 days, 7–20 days, 21–28 days) in adults with TRD. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect size across intravenous, intranasal and oral routes of administration. Analysis was also conducted evaluating the effect size of racemic ketamine to esketamine. The pooled effect size for intranasal ketamine/esketamine at 24 h was g = 1.247 (n = 5, 95% CI: 0.591–1.903, p 
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.050