Why Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy Failed in HCC. Can the New Immunotherapy Be Expected to Be Better?

Introduction HCC remains a challenging disease with its unique characteristics and aggressive behavior. Although there are some curative-intent treatments such as liver transplantation and surgical resection, they themselves did not cure the patients with relatively high recurrence rates. Several mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal cancer 2020-12, Vol.51 (4), p.1193-1196
1. Verfasser: Dikilitas, Mustafa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction HCC remains a challenging disease with its unique characteristics and aggressive behavior. Although there are some curative-intent treatments such as liver transplantation and surgical resection, they themselves did not cure the patients with relatively high recurrence rates. Several modalities including local ablation methods like TACE or TARE, systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or antiviral therapies are tested in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, but none of them offered a survival benefit (except antiviral therapy in HBV-related HCC). Conclusion After a decade of plateau in drug development, ICPIs came into podium with their different mechanism of action consistent with immunogenic nature of the disease and with high expectations, and ongoing trials will show if these agents can satisfy unmet demand in this area.
ISSN:1941-6628
1941-6636
DOI:10.1007/s12029-020-00497-7