Intra-individual comparison of dual portal venous phases for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma at gadoxetic acid–enhanced liver MRI

Objectives To compare the diagnostic performances of first and second portal venous phases (PVP1 and PVP2) in revealing washout and capsule appearance for non-invasive HCC diagnoses in gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI). Methods This retrospective study included 123 at-risk patients with 160 h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.824-833
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Hyo-Jin, Lee, Jeong Min, Jeon, Sun Kyung, Jang, Siwon, Park, Sungeun, Joo, Ijin, Yoon, Jeong Hee, Han, Joon Koo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To compare the diagnostic performances of first and second portal venous phases (PVP1 and PVP2) in revealing washout and capsule appearance for non-invasive HCC diagnoses in gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI). Methods This retrospective study included 123 at-risk patients with 160 hepatic observations (HCCs, n  = 116; non-HCC malignancies, n  = 18; benign, n  = 26) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) ≥ 1 cm at Gd-EOB-MRI. The mean time intervals from gadoxetic acid injection to PVP1 and PVP2 acquisitions were 53 ± 2 s and 73 ± 3 s, respectively. After evaluating image findings independently, imaging findings and diagnoses were finalized by a consensus of two radiologists using either PVP1 or PVP2 image sets according to the LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared. Results Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsule were observed in PVP2 (83.6% and 27.6%) than in PVP1 (50.9% and 19.8%) ( p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-020-07162-4