Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height

•A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiology & behavior 2020-12, Vol.227, p.113144-113144, Article 113144
Hauptverfasser: Pueo, Basilio, Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso, Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113144
container_issue
container_start_page 113144
container_title Physiology & behavior
container_volume 227
creator Pueo, Basilio
Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso
Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel
description •A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of the measure. Jumping is a simple exercise determined by several biomechanical and physiological factors. Measures of vertical jump height are common and easy to administer tests of lower limb muscle power that are carried out with several types of equipment. This study aimed to validate and address the usefulness of the combination of smartphone and computer-based applications (Smartphone-Kinovea) against a laboratory-based Motion Capture System. One hundred and twelve healthy adults performed three maximal-effort countermovement jumps each. Both instruments measured the heights of the 336 trials concurrently while tracking the excursion of the body center of gravity. The vertical velocity at take-off vto and the impulse J were computed with jump height h measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) results indicated very high agreement for h and vto (0.985) and almost perfect agreement for J (0.997), and Cronbach's α=0.99. Low mean differences were observed between instruments for h: -0.22 ± 1.15 cm, vto: -0.01 ± 0.04 m/s, and J: -0.56 ± 2.92 Ns, all p1). Bland-Altman plots showed very low mean systematic bias ± random errors (-0.22 ± 2.25 cm; -0.01 ± 0.08 m/s; -0.56 ± 5.73 Ns), without association between their magnitudes (r2=0.005, r2=0.005, r2=0.001). Finally, very high to practically perfect correlation between isntruments were observed (r = 0.985; r = 0.986; r = 0.997). Our results suggest that the Smartphone-Kinovea method is a valid and reliable, low-cost instrument to monitor changes in jump performance in a healthy, active population diverse in gender and physical condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113144
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2436403734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031938420304583</els_id><sourcerecordid>2436403734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-822a61412a944a0192ddf92c5a92f7e702fb5d726465c7aa09b8119808a47e333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EEk3DJyB5yYL0-JXXCqERAyONxAYQO6s6KRM3ThxcTqP-Ab6bNJk9tSnVrbpXqsPYaykOUsjq5nSYhwsdcTgooVZNamnME7aTTa2LUtTfn7KdEFoWrW7Mc_aC6CTW0kbv2J9vEHzv8-UtTxg8HH1YBw5TzxdCt4QJiXh0nEZIeR7ihP-WP_0Uzwh8jNnHaZUgXMgTp-jyb0jIXUy89wm7zEcEWhKOOOVr0hlT9h0EflrGmQ_ofwz5JXvmIBC-eux79vXuw5fbT8XD54_3t-8fik43bS4apaCSRipojQEhW9X3rlVdCa1yNdZCuWPZ16oyVdnVAKI9NlK2jWjA1Ki13rM3W-6c4q8FKdvRU4chwIRxIauMrozQ9cpmz8rttEuRKKGzc_IrhIuVwl6525N95G6v3O3GffW923y4_nH2mCx1HqcONxq2j_4_CX8BJBSRJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436403734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pueo, Basilio ; Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso ; Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pueo, Basilio ; Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso ; Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>•A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of the measure. Jumping is a simple exercise determined by several biomechanical and physiological factors. Measures of vertical jump height are common and easy to administer tests of lower limb muscle power that are carried out with several types of equipment. This study aimed to validate and address the usefulness of the combination of smartphone and computer-based applications (Smartphone-Kinovea) against a laboratory-based Motion Capture System. One hundred and twelve healthy adults performed three maximal-effort countermovement jumps each. Both instruments measured the heights of the 336 trials concurrently while tracking the excursion of the body center of gravity. The vertical velocity at take-off vto and the impulse J were computed with jump height h measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) results indicated very high agreement for h and vto (0.985) and almost perfect agreement for J (0.997), and Cronbach's α=0.99. Low mean differences were observed between instruments for h: -0.22 ± 1.15 cm, vto: -0.01 ± 0.04 m/s, and J: -0.56 ± 2.92 Ns, all p&lt;0.01. The smallest worthwhile change (SWC) and the typical error of measurement (SEM) were 1.34 cm, 0.81 cm for h; 1.15 m/s, 0.03 m/s for vto, and 2.93 Ns, 2.25 Ns for J, so the usefulness of the method is established (SWC/SEM&gt;1). Bland-Altman plots showed very low mean systematic bias ± random errors (-0.22 ± 2.25 cm; -0.01 ± 0.08 m/s; -0.56 ± 5.73 Ns), without association between their magnitudes (r2=0.005, r2=0.005, r2=0.001). Finally, very high to practically perfect correlation between isntruments were observed (r = 0.985; r = 0.986; r = 0.997). Our results suggest that the Smartphone-Kinovea method is a valid and reliable, low-cost instrument to monitor changes in jump performance in a healthy, active population diverse in gender and physical condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Application ; Countermovement jump ; Instrument ; Lower limb ; Swc</subject><ispartof>Physiology &amp; behavior, 2020-12, Vol.227, p.113144-113144, Article 113144</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-822a61412a944a0192ddf92c5a92f7e702fb5d726465c7aa09b8119808a47e333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-822a61412a944a0192ddf92c5a92f7e702fb5d726465c7aa09b8119808a47e333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938420304583$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pueo, Basilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height</title><title>Physiology &amp; behavior</title><description>•A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of the measure. Jumping is a simple exercise determined by several biomechanical and physiological factors. Measures of vertical jump height are common and easy to administer tests of lower limb muscle power that are carried out with several types of equipment. This study aimed to validate and address the usefulness of the combination of smartphone and computer-based applications (Smartphone-Kinovea) against a laboratory-based Motion Capture System. One hundred and twelve healthy adults performed three maximal-effort countermovement jumps each. Both instruments measured the heights of the 336 trials concurrently while tracking the excursion of the body center of gravity. The vertical velocity at take-off vto and the impulse J were computed with jump height h measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) results indicated very high agreement for h and vto (0.985) and almost perfect agreement for J (0.997), and Cronbach's α=0.99. Low mean differences were observed between instruments for h: -0.22 ± 1.15 cm, vto: -0.01 ± 0.04 m/s, and J: -0.56 ± 2.92 Ns, all p&lt;0.01. The smallest worthwhile change (SWC) and the typical error of measurement (SEM) were 1.34 cm, 0.81 cm for h; 1.15 m/s, 0.03 m/s for vto, and 2.93 Ns, 2.25 Ns for J, so the usefulness of the method is established (SWC/SEM&gt;1). Bland-Altman plots showed very low mean systematic bias ± random errors (-0.22 ± 2.25 cm; -0.01 ± 0.08 m/s; -0.56 ± 5.73 Ns), without association between their magnitudes (r2=0.005, r2=0.005, r2=0.001). Finally, very high to practically perfect correlation between isntruments were observed (r = 0.985; r = 0.986; r = 0.997). Our results suggest that the Smartphone-Kinovea method is a valid and reliable, low-cost instrument to monitor changes in jump performance in a healthy, active population diverse in gender and physical condition.</description><subject>Application</subject><subject>Countermovement jump</subject><subject>Instrument</subject><subject>Lower limb</subject><subject>Swc</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EEk3DJyB5yYL0-JXXCqERAyONxAYQO6s6KRM3ThxcTqP-Ab6bNJk9tSnVrbpXqsPYaykOUsjq5nSYhwsdcTgooVZNamnME7aTTa2LUtTfn7KdEFoWrW7Mc_aC6CTW0kbv2J9vEHzv8-UtTxg8HH1YBw5TzxdCt4QJiXh0nEZIeR7ihP-WP_0Uzwh8jNnHaZUgXMgTp-jyb0jIXUy89wm7zEcEWhKOOOVr0hlT9h0EflrGmQ_ofwz5JXvmIBC-eux79vXuw5fbT8XD54_3t-8fik43bS4apaCSRipojQEhW9X3rlVdCa1yNdZCuWPZ16oyVdnVAKI9NlK2jWjA1Ki13rM3W-6c4q8FKdvRU4chwIRxIauMrozQ9cpmz8rttEuRKKGzc_IrhIuVwl6525N95G6v3O3GffW923y4_nH2mCx1HqcONxq2j_4_CX8BJBSRJQ</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Pueo, Basilio</creator><creator>Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso</creator><creator>Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height</title><author>Pueo, Basilio ; Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso ; Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-822a61412a944a0192ddf92c5a92f7e702fb5d726465c7aa09b8119808a47e333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Application</topic><topic>Countermovement jump</topic><topic>Instrument</topic><topic>Lower limb</topic><topic>Swc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pueo, Basilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pueo, Basilio</au><au>Penichet-Tomas, Alfonso</au><au>Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height</atitle><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>227</volume><spage>113144</spage><epage>113144</epage><pages>113144-113144</pages><artnum>113144</artnum><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>•A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of the measure. Jumping is a simple exercise determined by several biomechanical and physiological factors. Measures of vertical jump height are common and easy to administer tests of lower limb muscle power that are carried out with several types of equipment. This study aimed to validate and address the usefulness of the combination of smartphone and computer-based applications (Smartphone-Kinovea) against a laboratory-based Motion Capture System. One hundred and twelve healthy adults performed three maximal-effort countermovement jumps each. Both instruments measured the heights of the 336 trials concurrently while tracking the excursion of the body center of gravity. The vertical velocity at take-off vto and the impulse J were computed with jump height h measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) results indicated very high agreement for h and vto (0.985) and almost perfect agreement for J (0.997), and Cronbach's α=0.99. Low mean differences were observed between instruments for h: -0.22 ± 1.15 cm, vto: -0.01 ± 0.04 m/s, and J: -0.56 ± 2.92 Ns, all p&lt;0.01. The smallest worthwhile change (SWC) and the typical error of measurement (SEM) were 1.34 cm, 0.81 cm for h; 1.15 m/s, 0.03 m/s for vto, and 2.93 Ns, 2.25 Ns for J, so the usefulness of the method is established (SWC/SEM&gt;1). Bland-Altman plots showed very low mean systematic bias ± random errors (-0.22 ± 2.25 cm; -0.01 ± 0.08 m/s; -0.56 ± 5.73 Ns), without association between their magnitudes (r2=0.005, r2=0.005, r2=0.001). Finally, very high to practically perfect correlation between isntruments were observed (r = 0.985; r = 0.986; r = 0.997). Our results suggest that the Smartphone-Kinovea method is a valid and reliable, low-cost instrument to monitor changes in jump performance in a healthy, active population diverse in gender and physical condition.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113144</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9384
ispartof Physiology & behavior, 2020-12, Vol.227, p.113144-113144, Article 113144
issn 0031-9384
1873-507X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2436403734
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Application
Countermovement jump
Instrument
Lower limb
Swc
title Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T23%3A12%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity,%20reliability%20and%20usefulness%20of%20smartphone%20and%20kinovea%20motion%20analysis%20software%20for%20direct%20measurement%20of%20vertical%20jump%20height&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Pueo,%20Basilio&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=227&rft.spage=113144&rft.epage=113144&rft.pages=113144-113144&rft.artnum=113144&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2436403734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436403734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0031938420304583&rfr_iscdi=true