Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height
•A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiology & behavior 2020-12, Vol.227, p.113144-113144, Article 113144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A smartphone and free motion analysis software can measure jump height accurately.•Low-cost instruments are a valid alternative to laboratory-based equipment.•Vertical jump tests measure physiological and biomechanical parameters.•The smartphone-kinovea method can detect changes over the noise of the measure.
Jumping is a simple exercise determined by several biomechanical and physiological factors. Measures of vertical jump height are common and easy to administer tests of lower limb muscle power that are carried out with several types of equipment. This study aimed to validate and address the usefulness of the combination of smartphone and computer-based applications (Smartphone-Kinovea) against a laboratory-based Motion Capture System. One hundred and twelve healthy adults performed three maximal-effort countermovement jumps each. Both instruments measured the heights of the 336 trials concurrently while tracking the excursion of the body center of gravity. The vertical velocity at take-off vto and the impulse J were computed with jump height h measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) results indicated very high agreement for h and vto (0.985) and almost perfect agreement for J (0.997), and Cronbach's α=0.99. Low mean differences were observed between instruments for h: -0.22 ± 1.15 cm, vto: -0.01 ± 0.04 m/s, and J: -0.56 ± 2.92 Ns, all p1). Bland-Altman plots showed very low mean systematic bias ± random errors (-0.22 ± 2.25 cm; -0.01 ± 0.08 m/s; -0.56 ± 5.73 Ns), without association between their magnitudes (r2=0.005, r2=0.005, r2=0.001). Finally, very high to practically perfect correlation between isntruments were observed (r = 0.985; r = 0.986; r = 0.997). Our results suggest that the Smartphone-Kinovea method is a valid and reliable, low-cost instrument to monitor changes in jump performance in a healthy, active population diverse in gender and physical condition. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-9384 1873-507X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113144 |