Effect of Relative Electron Density and Physical Density Adjustment in Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using PMMA Phantom

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to improve the accuracy of dose-distribution calculations by understanding how the calculated dose varies with the change in the relative electron density replacing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in patient-specific quality assurance. Method: We calculated the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 2020, Vol.76(8), pp.808-816
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Hiroyuki, Kawano, Kazuhiro, Tooyama, Takaaki, Kurosaki, Mitsuru, Iida, Ryo, Yamamoto, Shogo, Hirohashi, Rina, Tamamoto, Tetsuro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to improve the accuracy of dose-distribution calculations by understanding how the calculated dose varies with the change in the relative electron density replacing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in patient-specific quality assurance. Method: We calculated the relative electron density at which dose attenuation in each dose calculation algorithm coincides with the measured value of the dose attenuation of single-field irradiation. Next, the dose change was calculated by changing the relative electron density or physical electron density for substituting PMMA for each X-ray energy and calculation algorithm. Furthermore, using clinical plans, changes in point-dose verification and dose-distribution verification that occurred when the relative electron density or physical electron density was varied were investigated. Results: The dose attenuation varies depending on the dose-calculation algorithm, and the optimum value of the electron density is different for each. After the electron density optimization, the point dose verification using the 97.1% to 98.3% (3%/3 mm), 90.0% to 94.3% (2%/3 mm) and gained a dominant improvement tendency (P
ISSN:0369-4305
1881-4883
DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.8.808