Can the school environment influence oral health–related behaviours? A multilevel analysis of the Brazilian National Adolescent School‐Based Health Survey 2015

Objective To investigate the association between the potential support of schools for oral health promotion and a set of oral health–related behaviours among adolescent students in Brazilian state capitals. Methods A cross‐sectional study using individual and school environment data from the 2015 Br...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 2021-02, Vol.49 (1), p.23-32
Hauptverfasser: Nery, Newillames Gonçalves, Antunes, José Leopoldo Ferreira, Jordão, Lidia Moraes Ribeiro, Freire, Maria do Carmo Matias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To investigate the association between the potential support of schools for oral health promotion and a set of oral health–related behaviours among adolescent students in Brazilian state capitals. Methods A cross‐sectional study using individual and school environment data from the 2015 Brazilian National Adolescent School‐Based Health Survey (PeNSE) was conducted. The sample consisted of 51 192 students from 1339 public and private schools in the 27 Brazilian State Capitals, aged 11‐19 years old. The outcomes were six oral health‐related behaviours: dental visits; toothbrushing frequency; soft drink and sweets consumption; smoking and alcohol consumption. The explanatory variable was the Oral Health Promotion School Environment index (OHPSE). Covariates were the adolescents' sociodemographic characteristics and organizational aspects of the schools. A two‐level multilevel mixed‐effects Poisson regression analysis with fixed slopes and random intercepts was performed, considering the complex sample design. Results The prevalence of risk behaviours was 28.0% for ‘low frequency of annual dental visits’, 6.9% for ‘low daily toothbrushing frequency’, 28.8% for ‘high weekly soft drink consumption’, 41.7% for ‘high weekly sweet consumption’, 18.9% for ‘cigarette experimentation’ and 52.6% for ‘alcoholic beverage experimentation’. The schools were classified as low (36.3%), intermediate (30.4%) and high (33.3%) OHPSE. In the adjusted model, schools with ‘high OHPSE’ had lower prevalence of ‘low frequency of annual dental visits’ (PR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.90; 0.99]), ‘high weekly frequency of soft drink consumption’ (PR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.89; 0.99]) and ‘sweet consumption’ (PR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.93; 1.00]) than those with ‘low OHPSE’. In addition, schools with ‘intermediate OHPSE’ had higher prevalence's of ‘low daily toothbrushing frequency’ (PR = 1.12 [95% CI 1.03; 1.23]) and ‘cigarette experimentation’ (PR = 1.08 [95% CI 1.01; 1.16]) than those with ‘low OHPSE’. ‘Alcoholic beverage experimentation’ was not associated with OHPSE. Conclusions The potential support of schools for oral health promotion was associated with most of the oral health–related behaviours among adolescent students. Those attending schools with higher OHPSE scores reported a higher annual frequency of dental visits and a lower weekly frequency of soft drink and sweet consumption, while those in schools with intermediate OHPSE had a lower daily toothbrushing frequency and a higher rate of c
ISSN:0301-5661
1600-0528
DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12569