Safety of Use of a Sheet-Type Adhesion Barrier (Interceed®) During Liver Surgery

Background Adhesion barriers are increasingly used in hepatobiliary surgery. However, there has been no solid evidence yet in support of their safety. Methods Incidences of global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities were compared between 101 consecutive patients who received a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgery 2020-12, Vol.44 (12), p.4214-4220
Hauptverfasser: Okubo, Satoshi, Shindoh, Junichi, Kobayashi, Yuta, Hashimoto, Masaji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Adhesion barriers are increasingly used in hepatobiliary surgery. However, there has been no solid evidence yet in support of their safety. Methods Incidences of global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities were compared between 101 consecutive patients who received a sheet-type adhesion barrier (Interceed ® ) and 134 patients who did not receive any adhesion barriers during hepatectomy. Propensity score (PS) adjustment was used to account for potential bias to receive Interceed. Results In the PS-adjusted population, the incidences of both global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities showed no significant difference between the Interceed group and the control group (17.9% vs. 17.6%; P  = 0.948 and 7.8% vs. 9.1%; P  = 0.813, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that age + 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.15–2.50; P  = 0.007), estimated blood loss + 100 mL (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.09, P  = 0.009), and laparoscopic approach (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01–0.75; P  = 0.026) were independent predictors for global postoperative morbidities and operation time + 1 h (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.23–1.96; P  
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-020-05743-4