Safety of Use of a Sheet-Type Adhesion Barrier (Interceed®) During Liver Surgery
Background Adhesion barriers are increasingly used in hepatobiliary surgery. However, there has been no solid evidence yet in support of their safety. Methods Incidences of global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities were compared between 101 consecutive patients who received a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of surgery 2020-12, Vol.44 (12), p.4214-4220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Adhesion barriers are increasingly used in hepatobiliary surgery. However, there has been no solid evidence yet in support of their safety.
Methods
Incidences of global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities were compared between 101 consecutive patients who received a sheet-type adhesion barrier (Interceed
®
) and 134 patients who did not receive any adhesion barriers during hepatectomy. Propensity score (PS) adjustment was used to account for potential bias to receive Interceed.
Results
In the PS-adjusted population, the incidences of both global postoperative morbidities and major abdominal morbidities showed no significant difference between the Interceed group and the control group (17.9% vs. 17.6%;
P
= 0.948 and 7.8% vs. 9.1%;
P
= 0.813, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that age + 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.15–2.50;
P
= 0.007), estimated blood loss + 100 mL (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.09,
P
= 0.009), and laparoscopic approach (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01–0.75;
P
= 0.026) were independent predictors for global postoperative morbidities and operation time + 1 h (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.23–1.96;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0364-2313 1432-2323 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00268-020-05743-4 |