An Update on Cementless Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

➤ Cementless stems can be categorized using the updated classification system. ➤ Short stems were designed as an alternative to conventional stems with the advantage of bone preservation, and they have grown in popularity with promising results; however, long-term outcomes are lacking. ➤ Hydroxyapat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2020-09, Vol.102 (18), p.1646-1661
Hauptverfasser: Kheir, Michael M., Drayer, Nicholas J., Chen, Antonia F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:➤ Cementless stems can be categorized using the updated classification system. ➤ Short stems were designed as an alternative to conventional stems with the advantage of bone preservation, and they have grown in popularity with promising results; however, long-term outcomes are lacking. ➤ Hydroxyapatite coating appears to have no advantage with respect to stem loosening. ➤ The literature has shown no difference in revision rates between modular and nonmodular stems; however, with the advantages of equalizing limb lengths and offset come the drawbacks of corrosion and junctional fatigue failure of modular implants. ➤ There is increasing use of cementless stems, including in octogenarians, with promising outcomes compared with cemented stems; however, there is a higher risk of periprosthetic fractures with cementless fixation, particularly in elderly female patients.
ISSN:0021-9355
1535-1386
DOI:10.2106/JBJS.19.01397