Goal management training as a cognitive remediation intervention in depression: A randomized controlled trial

•Deficits in executive functions have a detrimental effect on everyday functioning in depression.•Goal management training was compared to computerized cognitive training for remediating everyday executive deficits in depression.•No statistically significant differences emerged between goal manageme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2020-10, Vol.275, p.268-277
Hauptverfasser: Hagen, Bjørn Ingulfsvann, Lau, Bjørn, Joormann, Jutta, Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova, Landrø, Nils Inge, Stubberud, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Deficits in executive functions have a detrimental effect on everyday functioning in depression.•Goal management training was compared to computerized cognitive training for remediating everyday executive deficits in depression.•No statistically significant differences emerged between goal management training and computerized cognitive training. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with deficits in executive functioning (EF) that may have a detrimental effect on everyday functioning. Despite this, there are no established cognitive remediation interventions available targeting EF in MDD. Hence, the primary aim of the present pre-registered randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of Goal Management Training (GMT), a metacognitive and strategy-based cognitive remediation intervention to improve EF in MDD. Sixty-three participants with current or previous mild or moderate MDD and self-reported executive deficits were included and randomized to nine sessions of either GMT (two hours, once weekly; n = 35) or computerized cognitive training (one hour, twice weekly; n = 28). Assessments were conducted at baseline (T1), immediately following training (T2), and at six-month follow-up (T3). The primary outcome measure was The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Adult version, pertained to daily life EF. Secondary outcome measures included additional EF assessments (performance-based measures and questionnaires), and depressive symptom severity. Forty-three participants completed treatment. Both groups improved following training, and linear mixed model analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups for any outcome measure. Additional exploratory within-group analyses revealed a statistically significant reduction of everyday executive dysfunction and reduced depressive symptoms at the six-month follow-up in GMT only. The study was single-blind, and the sample size was modest. Our findings indicate comparable improvements in everyday and performance-based measures of EF, in addition to reductions in depressive symptoms following both GMT and CCT.
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.015