Assessment of quality and safety in rhinologic day surgery

To assess and compare the safety and quality of the management of sinonasal surgery (all procedures) between day-case and traditional admission. A 2-year retrospective study included all patients undergoing functional septonasal surgery, ethmoidectomy, middle antrostomy, frontal sinusotomy or endosc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases head and neck diseases, 2021-05, Vol.138 (3), p.129-134
Hauptverfasser: Belleudy, S., Kérimian, M., Legrenzi, P., Alharbi, A., de Gabory, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess and compare the safety and quality of the management of sinonasal surgery (all procedures) between day-case and traditional admission. A 2-year retrospective study included all patients undergoing functional septonasal surgery, ethmoidectomy, middle antrostomy, frontal sinusotomy or endoscopic sphenoidotomy, as day-surgery on inpatient admission. Demographic, operative, pre- and post-operative anesthetic data, complications, and rates of emergency consultation and readmission within 30 days were collected and compared between out- and in-patients. Nine hundred and nine patients were included: 569 functional septonasal surgeries, 180 ethmoidectomies, 101 middle meatotomies, 40 Draf procedures and 19 sphenoidotomies; respectively 60%, 21%, 54%, 20% and 37% were performed in the day-surgery unit. There were no significant differences in number of emergency consultations or readmissions between the out- and in-patient groups. There were more complications in in-patients (P
ISSN:1879-7296
1879-730X
DOI:10.1016/j.anorl.2020.06.019