Assessment of quality and safety in rhinologic day surgery
To assess and compare the safety and quality of the management of sinonasal surgery (all procedures) between day-case and traditional admission. A 2-year retrospective study included all patients undergoing functional septonasal surgery, ethmoidectomy, middle antrostomy, frontal sinusotomy or endosc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases head and neck diseases, 2021-05, Vol.138 (3), p.129-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To assess and compare the safety and quality of the management of sinonasal surgery (all procedures) between day-case and traditional admission.
A 2-year retrospective study included all patients undergoing functional septonasal surgery, ethmoidectomy, middle antrostomy, frontal sinusotomy or endoscopic sphenoidotomy, as day-surgery on inpatient admission. Demographic, operative, pre- and post-operative anesthetic data, complications, and rates of emergency consultation and readmission within 30 days were collected and compared between out- and in-patients.
Nine hundred and nine patients were included: 569 functional septonasal surgeries, 180 ethmoidectomies, 101 middle meatotomies, 40 Draf procedures and 19 sphenoidotomies; respectively 60%, 21%, 54%, 20% and 37% were performed in the day-surgery unit. There were no significant differences in number of emergency consultations or readmissions between the out- and in-patient groups. There were more complications in in-patients (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1879-7296 1879-730X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.06.019 |