Combination therapy with pioglitazone/exenatide improves beta‐cell function and produces superior glycaemic control compared with basal/bolus insulin in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A 3‐year follow‐up of the Qatar study

Aim To examine the long‐term efficacy of thiazolidinedione plus a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist versus basal‐bolus insulin on glycaemic control and beta‐cell function in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin plus sulphonylurea. Materials and Methods Three hund...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2020-12, Vol.22 (12), p.2287-2294
Hauptverfasser: Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad, Migahid, Osama, Megahed, Ayman, DeFronzo, Ralph A., Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa, Jayyousi, Amin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To examine the long‐term efficacy of thiazolidinedione plus a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist versus basal‐bolus insulin on glycaemic control and beta‐cell function in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin plus sulphonylurea. Materials and Methods Three hundred and thirty‐one patients with poorly controlled T2D were recruited over 3 years and were followed for an additional year. Subjects received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at baseline and at study end. After completing the baseline OGTT, subjects were randomized to receive either pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide (combination therapy) or basal/bolus insulin (insulin therapy) to maintain an HbA1c of less than 7.0%. The primary outcome of the study was the difference in HbA1c at study end between the two treatment groups. Results Both therapies caused a robust decrease in HbA1c. However, combination therapy caused a greater decrement (−1.1%, P 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.14153