Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education

Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2020-10, Vol.57 (10), p.1238-1246
Hauptverfasser: Kantar, Rami S., Breugem, Corstiaan C., Keith, Kristen, Kassam, Serena, Vijayakumar, Charanya, Bow, Mikaela, Alfonso, Allyson R., Chahine, Elsa M., Ghotmi, Lilian H., Patel, Krishna G., Shetye, Pradip R., Santiago, Pedro E., Losee, Joseph E., Steinbacher, Derek M., Rossell-Perry, Percy, Garib, Daniela G., Alonso, Nivaldo, Mann, Robert J., Prada-Madrid, Jose Rolando, Esenlik, Elçin, Pamplona, María del Carmen, Collares, Marcus Vinícius Martins, Bennun, Ricardo D., Kummer, Ann, Giugliano, Carlos, Padwa, Bonnie L., Raposo-Amaral, Cassio Eduardo, Tse, Raymond, Sommerlad, Brian, Flores, Roberto L., Hamdan, Usama S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P < .001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P < .001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants’ clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.
ISSN:1055-6656
1545-1569
DOI:10.1177/1055665620944781