A modified GAP model for East-Asian populations with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

The easy-to-calculate gender, age, and lung physiology (GAP) model shows good predictive and discriminative performance in the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the GAP model was not effective in predicting the prognosis accurately in previous Japanese and Korean IPF cohort...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory investigation 2020-09, Vol.58 (5), p.395-402
Hauptverfasser: Nishikiori, Hirotaka, Chiba, Hirofumi, Lee, Sang Hoon, Kondoh, Shun, Kamo, Ken-ichi, Nakamura, Koshi, Ikeda, Kimiyuki, Kuronuma, Koji, Chung, Man Pyo, Kondoh, Yasuhiro, Homma, Sakae, Inase, Naohiko, Park, Moo Suk, Takahashi, Hiroki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The easy-to-calculate gender, age, and lung physiology (GAP) model shows good predictive and discriminative performance in the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the GAP model was not effective in predicting the prognosis accurately in previous Japanese and Korean IPF cohort studies. Therefore, we developed a modified GAP model for the East-Asian populations by weighing the GAP variables. The validity of the modified GAP model was subsequently evaluated in East-Asian IPF patients. The derivation cohort comprised 326 patients with IPF. Weights of the variables were adjusted on the basis of coefficients derived from Cox regression models. The total points were distributed to the three stages of the disease so that the number of patients included in each stage was appropriate. The validity of the modified model was analyzed in another Japanese cohort of 117 patients with IPF and a nationwide cohort of Korean patients with IPF. Predicted survival rates differed significantly in the derivation cohort using the modified GAP model for each stage of IPF (log-rank test: stage I vs. stage II, p 
ISSN:2212-5345
2212-5353
DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2020.04.001