Role of Post-Stent Physiological Assessment in a Risk Prediction Model After Coronary Stent Implantation

The aim of this study was to develop a risk model incorporating clinical, angiographic, and physiological parameters to predict future clinical events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Prognostic factors after coronary stenting have not been comprehensively investigated. A risk model to predict...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2020-07, Vol.13 (14), p.1639-1650
Hauptverfasser: Hwang, Doyeon, Lee, Joo Myung, Yang, Seokhun, Chang, Mineok, Zhang, Jinlong, Choi, Ki Hong, Kim, Chee Hae, Nam, Chang-Wook, Shin, Eun-Seok, Kwak, Jae-Jin, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Hoshino, Masahiro, Hamaya, Rikuta, Kanaji, Yoshihisa, Murai, Tadashi, Zhang, Jun-Jie, Ye, Fei, Li, Xiaobo, Ge, Zhen, Chen, Shao-Liang, Kakuta, Tsunekazu, Koo, Bon-Kwon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to develop a risk model incorporating clinical, angiographic, and physiological parameters to predict future clinical events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Prognostic factors after coronary stenting have not been comprehensively investigated. A risk model to predict target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years was developed from 2,200 patients who underwent second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and post-stent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. A random survival forest model with automatic feature selection by minimal depth analysis was used for risk model development. During 2 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of TVF was 5.9%. From clinical, angiographic, and physiological parameters, 6 variables were selected for the risk model in order of importance within the model as follows: total stent length, post-stent FFR, age, post-stent percentage diameter stenosis, reference vessel diameter, and diabetes mellitus. Harrell’s C index of the random survival forest model was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 0.82). This risk model showed better prediction ability than models with clinical risk factors alone (Harrell’s C index = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.59; p for comparison = 0.005) and with clinical risk factors and angiographic parameters (Harrell’s C index = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.77; p for comparison = 0.045). When the patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median of total stent length (30 mm), post-stent FFR and total stent length showed the highest variable importance in the short- and long-stent groups, respectively. A risk model incorporating clinical, angiographic, and physiological predictors can help predict the risk for TVF at 2 years after coronary stenting. Total stent length and post-stent FFR were the most important predictors. (International Post PCI FFR Registry; NCT04012281) [Display omitted]
ISSN:1936-8798
1876-7605
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.041