Impact of the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Multicenter Cohort Study of 133 Women With Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease

Objective We aimed to investigate the impact of applying the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a previously described cohort of women with undifferentiated connectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2021-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1804-1808
Hauptverfasser: Radin, Massimo, Schreiber, Karen, Cecchi, Irene, Bortoluzzi, Alessandra, Crisafulli, Francesca, Freitas, Cristiano M., Bacco, Beatrice, Rubini, Elena, Foddai, Silvia G., Padovan, Melissa, Gallo Cassarino, Silvia, Franceschini, Franco, Andrade, Danieli, Benedetto, Chiara, Govoni, Marcello, Bertero, Tiziana, Marozio, Luca, Roccatello, Dario, Andreoli, Laura, Sciascia, Savino
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective We aimed to investigate the impact of applying the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a previously described cohort of women with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). Methods This study included 133 women with UCTD. At the time of inclusion into the study, none of the patients met any classification criteria for other defined systemic connective tissue disease. Results When applying the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria to the cohort, 22 patients (17%) fulfilled the classification criteria for SLE. Patients classified as having SLE had significantly higher frequencies of mucocutaneous manifestations (23% versus 5%; P = 0.007), arthritis (59% versus 17%; P < 0.001), isolated urine abnormalities (18% versus 1%; P < 0.001), and highly specific antibodies (50% versus 15%; P < 0.001) compared to the other patients with UCTD. At follow‐up, these patients were statistically significantly more likely to also meet the 1997 ACR revised SLE criteria and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria (18.2% versus 1.8%; P < 0.001) compared to the other UCTD patients. Patients who were diagnosed as having SLE according to the ACR 1997 update of the SLE revised criteria and the SLICC criteria during the follow‐up scored higher on outcome measures when classified as having SLE according to the new 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria when compared to the other patients with UCTD (mean ± SD score 8.3 ± 3.7 versus 4.5 ± 4; P < 0.05). Conclusion When applying the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria for SLE in a cohort of patients with UCTD, we observed that in up to 17% of cases the original classification could be challenged. New implementation will help to identify earlier patients at higher risk of developing more severe CTD manifestations.
ISSN:2151-464X
2151-4658
2151-4658
DOI:10.1002/acr.24391