Socially Parasitic Ants Evolve a Mosaic of Host-Matching and Parasitic Morphological Traits

A basic expectation of evolution by natural selection is that species morphologies will adapt to their ecological niche. In social organisms, this may include selective pressure from the social environment. Many non-ant parasites of ant colonies are known to mimic the morphology of their host specie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current biology 2020-09, Vol.30 (18), p.3639-3646.e4
Hauptverfasser: Fischer, Georg, Friedman, Nicholas R., Huang, Jen-Pan, Narula, Nitish, Knowles, L. Lacey, Fisher, Brian L., Mikheyev, Alexander S., Economo, Evan P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A basic expectation of evolution by natural selection is that species morphologies will adapt to their ecological niche. In social organisms, this may include selective pressure from the social environment. Many non-ant parasites of ant colonies are known to mimic the morphology of their host species, often in striking fashion [1, 2], indicating there is selection on parasite morphology to match the host (Batesian and/or Wasmannian mimicry [3]). However, ants that parasitize other ant societies are usually closely related to their hosts (Emery’s rule) [4–8] and expected to be similar due to common ancestry, making any kind of mimicry difficult to detect [9]. Here, we investigate the diversification of the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole in Madagascar, including the evolution of 13 putative social parasite species within a broader radiation of over 100 ant species on the island. We find that the parasitic species are monophyletic and that their associated hosts are spread across the Malagasy Pheidole radiation. This provides an opportunity to test for selection on morphological similarity and divergence between parasites and hosts. Using X-ray microtomography and both linear measurements and three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometrics, we show that ant social parasite worker morphologies feature a mix of “host-matching” and “parasitic” traits, where the former converge on the host phenotype and the latter diverge from typical Pheidole phenotypes to match a common parasitic syndrome. This finding highlights the role of social context in shaping the evolution of phenotypes and raises questions about the role of morphological sensing in nestmate recognition. •A monophyletic group of Malagasy Pheidole ants parasitizes congeneric host species•Host species are not the closest relatives of parasites; Emery’s rule does not apply•2D and 3D analyses show parasite morphology tends to match their host•Morphological sensing by hosts is proposed as a selective force (Wasmannian mimicry) Fischer, Friedman et al. find an interesting clade of ants that parasitize other, closely related ants from Madagascar. Morphological analyses reveal that parasite morphology evolves to match host morphology, raising questions about the role of morphological sensing in social insect recognition systems.
ISSN:0960-9822
1879-0445
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.078