Carotid and cerebrovascular dual-energy computed tomography angiography: Optimization of window settings for virtual monoenergetic imaging reconstruction
•Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) can be calculated from dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA).•VMI reconstructions can drastically improve vessel contrast, but require dedicated windowing.•Both subjectively best (B–W/L) and objectively best (O–W/L) window settings were assessed.•Ideal window settin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2020-09, Vol.130, p.109166-109166, Article 109166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) can be calculated from dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA).•VMI reconstructions can drastically improve vessel contrast, but require dedicated windowing.•Both subjectively best (B–W/L) and objectively best (O–W/L) window settings were assessed.•Ideal window settings for VMI and novel VMI + were significantly higher than for standard DE-CTA.•Readers subjectively prefered M40+ reconstructions regarding overall image quality.
Dedicated post-processing of dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DE-CTA) datasets has been shown to allow for increased vascular contrast. The goal of our study was to define optimal window settings for displaying virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) reconstructed from dual-energy carotid and cerebrovascular DE-CTA.
Fifty-seven patients who underwent clinically-indicated carotid and cerebrovascular third-generation dual-source DE-CTA were retrospectively evaluated. Standard linearly-blended (M_0.6), 70-keV traditional VMI (M70), and 40-keV noise-optimized VMI (M40+) reconstructions were analyzed. For M70 and M40+ datasets, the subjectively best window setting (width and level, B–W/L) was independently determined by two observers and subsequently related with aortic arch attenuation to calculate optimized values (O–W/L) using linear regression. Subjective evaluation of image quality (IQ) between W/L settings were assessed by two additional readers. Repeated measures analysis of variance were performed to compare W/L settings and IQ indices between M_0.6, M70, and M40 + .
B–W/L and O–W/L for M70 were 580/210 and 560/200, and for M40+ were 1630/570 and 1560/550, respectively, higher than standard DE-CTA W/L settings (450/100). Highest subjective scores were observed for M40+ regarding overall IQ (all p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109166 |