Analysis of textbook outcomes among patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A multi‐institutional analysis of the US Sarcoma Collaborative
Background The novel composite metric textbook outcome (TO) has increasingly been used as a quality indicator but has not been reported among patients undergoing surgical resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) using multi‐institutional collaborative data. Methods All patients who underwent rese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2020-11, Vol.122 (6), p.1189-1198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The novel composite metric textbook outcome (TO) has increasingly been used as a quality indicator but has not been reported among patients undergoing surgical resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) using multi‐institutional collaborative data.
Methods
All patients who underwent resection for RPS between 2000 to 2016 from eight academic institutions were included. TO was defined as a patient with R0/R1 resection that discharged to home and was without transfusion, reoperation, grade ≥2 complications, hospital‐stay >50th percentile, or 90‐day readmission or mortality. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed.
Results
Among 627 patients, 56.1% were female and the median age was 59 years. A minority of patients achieved a TO (34.9%). Factors associated with achieving a TO were tumor size |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.26136 |