The Impact of Dermal Fillers on Perceived Personality Traits and Attractiveness

Background Dermal fillers are increasingly popular for facial rejuvenation and enhancement, including effacement of nasolabial folds (NLFs) and marionette lines and lip augmentation. This study aimed to evaluate casual observer perception of physical and interpersonal traits of subjects who receive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic plastic surgery 2021-02, Vol.45 (1), p.273-280
Hauptverfasser: Othman, Sammy, Cohn, Jason E., Daggumati, Srihari, Bloom, Jason D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Dermal fillers are increasingly popular for facial rejuvenation and enhancement, including effacement of nasolabial folds (NLFs) and marionette lines and lip augmentation. This study aimed to evaluate casual observer perception of physical and interpersonal traits of subjects who receive filler treatment. Methods An anonymous survey of 8 before/after treatment photographical sets was administered in Likert scale format (1–7) using online crowdsourcing. Three sets of photographs were before/after NLF/ marionette line treatment, three of lip augmentation, and two internal controls. Respondents were surveyed on personal demographics, as well as perceptions of subject photographs across nine domains (facial symmetry, confidence, likeability, youthfulness, trustworthiness, attractiveness, intelligence, approachability, happiness). Results In total, 260 respondents completed the survey. The majority were male (63.1%), Caucasian (58.1%), 18–34 years old (58.1%), and college graduates (66.2%). Respondents rated photographs with line filler treatment and lip filler treatment as significantly improved compared to the pre-treatment photographs across all nine trait domains [ p   0.05, for all]. Middle-aged respondents (35–55 years) were more likely to perceive treated filler photographs as more youthful than younger respondents (18–34 years) [ p  
ISSN:0364-216X
1432-5241
DOI:10.1007/s00266-020-01888-8