Simulation training to improve aseptic non-touch technique and success during intravenous cannulation—effect on hospital-acquired blood stream infection and knowledge retention after 6 months: The snowball effect theory

Background: Intravenous cannulation is a common procedure and a valuable skill in the neonatal intensive care unit. Standardized procedure and personnel training are needed in the unit to prevent hospital-acquired blood stream infections. Hence, we evaluated the effect of training using a low-fideli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2021-05, Vol.22 (3), p.353-358
Hauptverfasser: Balachander, Bharathi, Rajesh, Deepa, Pinto, Bonita Viona, Stevens, Sofia, Rao PN, Suman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Intravenous cannulation is a common procedure and a valuable skill in the neonatal intensive care unit. Standardized procedure and personnel training are needed in the unit to prevent hospital-acquired blood stream infections. Hence, we evaluated the effect of training using a low-fidelity simulation on the improvement of the aseptic non-touch technique during intravenous cannulation and knowledge retention after 6 months. Methods: The study was conducted in a tertiary care neonatal unit from June 2017 to July 2018. All the staff nurses and junior resident doctors posted in the neonatal intensive care were included in the study. A protocol and checklist score sheet was developed. The score sheet consisted of 23 items with a total score of 46. Participants were expected to obtain a minimum of 80%. A pre-test was conducted initially, followed by a formal training and then a post-test. The NITA newborn venous access mannequin was used to facilitate the training. A re-training for new nurses was conducted after 6 months. Data were analyzed using paired t-test. Results: A total of 29 doctors and nurses were enrolled in the training. The mean pre-test score was 29.93 compared to 42.66 in the post-test scores (mean difference 12.24(95% confidence interval: 9.39–16.05), p 
ISSN:1129-7298
1724-6032
DOI:10.1177/1129729820938202