Sex Differences in Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure

This study sought to use INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) results to evaluate sex differences in the use and clinical outcomes of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Despite a similar incidence of heart failure in men and women, prior studies have hi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Heart failure 2020-09, Vol.8 (9), p.770-779
Hauptverfasser: Gruen, Jadry, Caraballo, Cesar, Miller, P. Elliott, McCullough, Megan, Mezzacappa, Catherine, Ravindra, Neal, Mullan, Clancy W., Reinhardt, Samuel W., Mori, Makoto, Velazquez, Eric, Geirsson, Arnar, Ahmad, Tariq, Desai, Nihar R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study sought to use INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) results to evaluate sex differences in the use and clinical outcomes of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Despite a similar incidence of heart failure in men and women, prior studies have highlighted potential underuse of LVADs in women, and studies of clinical outcomes have yielded conflicting results. Patients were enrolled from the INTERMACS study who underwent implantation of their first continuous-flow LVAD between 2008 and 2017, and survival analyses stratified by sex were conducted. Among the 18,868 patients, 3,984 (21.1%) were women. At 1 year, women were less likely to undergo heart transplantation than men (17.9% vs. 20.0%, respectively; p = 0.003). After multivariable adjustments, women had a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 1.23; p 
ISSN:2213-1779
2213-1787
DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2020.04.015