A combination of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation pathways improves perioperative outcomes and costs for robotic radical prostatectomy

Background An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway has shown benefit in oncologic surgery. However, literature is scarce regarding the impact of this pathway, alone or combined with prehabilitation (PreHab) programs, on outcomes after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Cancer 2020-09, Vol.126 (18), p.4148-4155
Hauptverfasser:	Ploussard, Guillaume, Almeras, Christophe, Beauval, Jean‐Baptiste, Gautier, Jean‐Romain, Garnault, Valérie, Frémont, Natacha, Dallemagne, Stéphanie, Loison, Guillaume, Salin, Ambroise, Tollon, Christophe
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Blood Cancer surgery enhanced recovery after surgery Health care expenditures Multivariate analysis Oncology outpatient Patients prehabilitation Prostate cancer Prostatectomy radical prostatectomy Recovery (Medical) Robotic surgery Surgery Urological surgery
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Background An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway has shown benefit in oncologic surgery. However, literature is scarce regarding the impact of this pathway, alone or combined with prehabilitation (PreHab) programs, on outcomes after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods Included in this study were 507 consecutive patients undergoing RARP from 2014 to 2019. The primary endpoint was duration of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, readmission rate, and overall costs. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed according to the ERAS and PreHab program status. Results ERAS patients had shorter hospital stays (P
ISSN:	0008-543X 1097-0142
DOI:	10.1002/cncr.33061