The Effects of Three Correction Strategies of Errors on the Snatch Technique in 10–12-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACTSouissi, MA, Elghoul, Y, Souissi, H, Masmoudi, L, Ammar, A, Hamdi chtourou, and Souissi, N. The effects of three corrections strategies of errors on the snatch technique in 10–12-year-old childrenA randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2020—Sports movement correction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1218-1224
Hauptverfasser: Souissi, Mohamed A., Elghoul, Yousri, Souissi, Hichem, Masmoudi, Liwa, Ammar, Achraf, Chtourou, Hamdi, Souissi, Nizar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTSouissi, MA, Elghoul, Y, Souissi, H, Masmoudi, L, Ammar, A, Hamdi chtourou, and Souissi, N. The effects of three corrections strategies of errors on the snatch technique in 10–12-year-old childrenA randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2020—Sports movement correction is one of the major problems for motor control and learning. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine which of the 3 strategies, i.e., the self-observation method with direct instructions (SO-DI), self-observation alone (SO), or the direct instruction (DI), would be useful for correcting errors during the snatch technique. Forty-eight children with 2 months of experience were randomly assigned to one of 4 training conditionsSO-DI, SO, DI, or control. In this study, the experience lasted 15 sessions. Subjects completed the test sessions before (T0) and after (T1) 12 training sessions and a retention test session after 2 weeks (T2). The Kinovea version 0.8.15 software was used to measure the kinematic parameters of weightlifting performance. After the training intervention, the data showed that the SO-DI group registered a greater improvement in all kinematic parameters compared with the SO, DI, and control groups, and this benefit was present 2 weeks later in the retention test (e.g., the horizontal displacement of the bar in the first pull with respect to the starting position [T1 vs. T0+32.57 ± 6.69%, d = 1.87, p < 0.001; T2 vs. T025.07 ± 11.55%, d = 1.32, p < 0.001] and the horizontal displacement of the bar between the receiving position and the reference line [T1 vs. T024.34 ± 29%, d = 1.17, p < 0.01; T2 vs. T025.53 ± 30.4%, d = 0.99, p < 0.01]). The results of the present study could have practical implications for physical education teachers because, even if practice is required to improve the technique, the effectiveness of the learning process is essential to enhance learner self-efficacy and motivation.
ISSN:1064-8011
1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003707