Radiofrequency Thoracic Sympathectomy for Sympathetically Maintained Chronic Post‐Mastectomy Pain, a Preliminary Report: 6‐Month Results

Aim Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of radiofrequency thoracic sympathectomy for sympathetically maintained post‐mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). Methods Patients with PMPS randomized to Group TS (n = 33) received radiofrequency thoracic sympathectomy, and those randomized to Group Sham (n = 33...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain practice 2021-01, Vol.21 (1), p.54-63
Hauptverfasser: Hetta, Diab Fuad, Mohamed, Ashraf Amin, Hetta, Helal F., Abd EL‐Hakeem, Essam Ezzat, Boshra, Madona Misheal, El‐Barody, Mohamed Moamen, Fattah Mohammad, Montaser A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of radiofrequency thoracic sympathectomy for sympathetically maintained post‐mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). Methods Patients with PMPS randomized to Group TS (n = 33) received radiofrequency thoracic sympathectomy, and those randomized to Group Sham (n = 33) received no radiofrequency current. Postoperative pain treatment consisted of duloxetine, pregabalin, and tramadol for both groups. The outcome variables were the proportion of patients who showed >50% reduction in their VAS pain score, the pain intensity measured by VAS score, and the global perceived effect (GPE) evaluated during the 6‐month follow‐up period. Results A significantly higher proportion of patients experienced >50% reduction in pain in Group TS (Group TS 25/30 [83.3%] vs. Group Sham 18/31 [58%], P = 0.032); the proportion of patients who experienced >50% reduction in their pain without analgesics was significantly higher in Group TS (Group TS 10/25 [40%] vs. Group Sham 0/18 [0%], P = 0.001). Furthermore, the proportion of patients treated with tramadol + duloxetine + pregabalin who experienced >50% reduction in their pain was significantly lower in Group TS (Group TS 0/25 [0%] vs. Group Sham 13/18 [75%], P = 0.001). The VAS pain score was significantly lower in Group TS at 2 weeks and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months following the procedure. The GPE was significantly higher in Group TS (Group TS median GPE [interquartile range]) 7 [5, 7] vs. Group Sham median GPE [interquartile range]) 5 [4, 6]) P 
ISSN:1530-7085
1533-2500
DOI:10.1111/papr.12933