Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Traditionally Open Surgeries in Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and traditional open surgery for the correction of symptomatic hallux valgus. A literature search was conducted, and a total of 11 studies with 1166 (52.98%, cases) patients treated with MIS and 1035 (47.02%, cases) patients treated with traditionally open surgery were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled data (odds ratio [OR] 6.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.20 to 12.32, Z = 5.35, p < .01) indicated that patients treated with MIS had a significantly higher rate of excellent-good radiographic angular results than did patients treated with open surgery. However, the incidences of complications (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.91, Z = 0.75, p = .45), recovery time (standard mean difference ‒3.09, 95% CI ‒7.98 to 1.80, Z = 1.24, p = .22), and patient-reported satisfaction (OR 2.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 10.65, Z = 1.48, p = .14) were similar between patients with hallux valgus treated with MIS and patients treated with open surgery. Heterogeneity between the sources of the pooled data threatened the validity of our observations, and we used statistical methods that aimed to limit such biases. At this time, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm or refute the results of this investigation.