A multicenter validation of the revised version of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC)

•FNA cytology can obtain a precise insight of the salivary gland lumps.•The MSRSGC is a 6-tiered classification which estimates the risk of malignancy (ROM).•The revised MSRSGC supplements FNA cytology with some crucial clinical consideration. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a basic step i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2020-10, Vol.109, p.104867-104867, Article 104867
Hauptverfasser: Mazzola, F., Tomasoni, M., Mocellin, D., Dalè, M., Iandelli, A., Carobbio, A., Marchi, F., Filauro, M., Petruzzi, G., Massa, B., Facchetti, M., Battocchio, S., Marandino, F., Lombardi, D., Pichi, B., Pellini, R., Nicolai, P., Peretti, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•FNA cytology can obtain a precise insight of the salivary gland lumps.•The MSRSGC is a 6-tiered classification which estimates the risk of malignancy (ROM).•The revised MSRSGC supplements FNA cytology with some crucial clinical consideration. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a basic step in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors that have a wide variety of histological types. The recent Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) can correlate the risk of malignancy with precise cytological features. A revised version was recently proposed to improve the surgical relevance and facilitate uniform management. A multicenter study retrospectively used the original and revised MSRSGC criteria to classify a series of patients who received surgery after FNAC. We enrolled 503 patients from three tertiary centers. The risk of malignancy for the MSRSGC resulted 19.5% in cat. I, 14.3% in cat. II, 17.6% in cat. III, 3.6% in cat. IVa, 24.6% in cat. IVb, 66.7% in cat. V, and 96.8% in cat. VI. The results from the revised MSRSGC were consistent with the original values. The MSRSGC is a promising classification system. In our opinion, the revised version of the MSRSGC supplements FNAC with some crucial clinical information and can better identify the appropriate treatment in each category.
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104867