Effects of exposure to anionic surfactants (SDBS and SDS) on nitrogen removal of aerobic denitrifier

In order to explain the effect of anionic surfactants on aerobic denitrification in the urban river, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) and sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) were added in aerobic denitrifier and the efficiency of nitrogen removal, microbial mechanisms, and enzyme activity was inve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research 2020-12, Vol.92 (12), p.2129-2139
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Chao, Li, Ying, Zhang, Tingyue, Liu, Jiamin, Yuan, Yuxin, Huang, Minsheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In order to explain the effect of anionic surfactants on aerobic denitrification in the urban river, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) and sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS) were added in aerobic denitrifier and the efficiency of nitrogen removal, microbial mechanisms, and enzyme activity was investigated in this study. The results showed that the total nitrogen (TN) and the nitrate nitrogen (NO3‐‐N) removal efficiency decreased as an increase of SDBS concentration. In contrast, 59.70% of the TN and 75.12% of NO3‐‐N were removed as the SDBS was 0 mg/L (Control). When SDBS was 200 mg/L (SDBS‐200), the removal efficiency of TN and NO3‐‐N was reduced to 4.92% and 4.00%, respectively. However, the denitrification efficiency was significantly accelerated when the concentration of SDS increased, except for 200 mg/L treatment (SDS‐200). As the SDS increased from 0 to 100 mg/L (SDS‐100), the removal efficiency of TN and NO3‐‐N raised from 59.70% to 70.8% and from 75.12% to 85.08%, respectively. The community structure of aerobic denitrifiers was significantly affected in the SDBS and SDS. While the Cupriavidus and Achromobacter were dominant genera in the group of Control (39.59%, and 42.45%) and SDS‐100 (44.40% and 34.86%), the relative abundance of Cupriavidus increased to 84.06% and 59.45% in the group of SDBS‐200 and SDS‐200, respectively. Enzyme activity assays proved that the nitrite reductase (NiR) relative activity of aerobic denitrification was suppressed by both SDBS and SDS. The increase in the SDS concentrations (from 0 to 50 mg/L) resulted in sharp growth of the nitrate reductase (NR) relative activities (from 100% to 146.86%). These findings demonstrated that SDBS and SDS affected aerobic denitrification efficiency of the aerobic denitrifiers by changing its microbial community structure and enzyme activity. Practitioner points SDS strengthened aerobic denitrification at low concentration, but the aerobic denitrifiers were inhibited in SDBS. The variation of community structure played a vital role in the aerobic denitrification system. The enzyme activity was seriously affected by SDBS and SDS. Microorganisms and enzyme activity were synergistically involved in the aerobic denitrification. The selected dominant aerobic denitrifiers and SDBS/SDS were inoculated into Erlenmeyer flasks (500 mL) of 250 ml DM (1%, V/V) with denitrification experiment .the flasks then were sealed with sterile breathable sealing membranes and shaken at 30 °C and 120r/min
ISSN:1061-4303
1554-7531
DOI:10.1002/wer.1384