Therapeutic plasma exchange in acute on chronic liver failure

Background Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been identified as a distinct syndrome due to acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis accompanied by extra‐hepatic organ failure, primarily caused by an overwhelming systemic immune response. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been demonstrated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical apheresis 2020-08, Vol.35 (4), p.316-327
Hauptverfasser: Stahl, Klaus, Busch, Markus, Fuge, Jan, Schneider, Andrea, Manns, Michael P., Seeliger, Benjamin, Schmidt, Julius J., Wiesner, Olaf, Schmidt, Bernhard M.W., Taubert, Richard, Vondran, Florian W.R., Hoeper, Marius M., David, Sascha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been identified as a distinct syndrome due to acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis accompanied by extra‐hepatic organ failure, primarily caused by an overwhelming systemic immune response. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial to improve transplant free survival in acute liver failure. Here we investigated if TPE might have comparable beneficial effects in patients with ACLF. Methods Thirty‐one patients with ACLF that were treated with TPE were enrolled into this retrospective analysis and 1:1 matched to an ACLF cohort treated with standard medical therapy (SMT) only. Results Patients considered for a bridge to recovery (n = 21 each group) approach had a 30‐day mortality >90% that was not improved by TPE (P = .185). Deaths occurred in the SMT group at significant earlier time points compared to the patients treated with TPE (mortality at 5 days: 33.3% for TPE and 66.7% for SMT, P = .048). However, patients who received TPE as a bridge to transplant strategy (n = 10) survived in 60% of cases and demonstrated 24 hours after study inclusion a stabilization of organ dysfunction (organ failures at inclusion: 4 (3‐5) vs 24 hours after inclusion: 3 (2‐4), P = .031 and CLIF‐C‐ACLF score: 64 (49‐76) vs 54 (49‐66), P = .043) not seen in SMT patients. Conclusions Although these retrospective data need to be interpreted with caution, they suggest that TPE in ACLF patients is feasible but not suitable as a bridge to recovery strategy. In selected patients TPE might assist as bridge to transplant.
ISSN:0733-2459
1098-1101
DOI:10.1002/jca.21799