Impact of Early (≤24 h) Versus Delayed (>24 h) Intervention in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Study of 20,882 Patients From the London Heart Attack Group

We aimed to investigate the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography and subsequent intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. We examined the impact of early (≤24 h) versus delayed (>24 h) intervention in a large observational cohort of 20,882...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular revascularization medicine 2021-01, Vol.22, p.3-7
Hauptverfasser: Panoulas, Vasileios, Rathod, Krishnaraj S., Jain, Ajay K., Firoozi, Sam, Nevett, Joanne, Kalra, Sundeep S., Malik, Iqbal S., Mathur, Anthony, Redwood, Simon, MacCarthy, Philip A., Wragg, Andrew, Jones, Daniel A., Dalby, Miles C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We aimed to investigate the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography and subsequent intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. We examined the impact of early (≤24 h) versus delayed (>24 h) intervention in a large observational cohort of 20,882 consecutive NSTEMI patients treated with PCI between 2005 and 2015 at 8 tertiary cardiac centers in London (UK) using Cox-regression analysis and propensity matching. Mean age was 64.5 ± 12.7 years and 26.1% were females. A quarter (27.6%), were treated within 24 h. Patients treated within 24 h were slightly younger (62.8 ± 12.8 vs. 65.2 ± 12.6, p 
ISSN:1553-8389
1878-0938
DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.06.001