Evaluation of liver iron overload with R2 relaxometry with versus without fat suppression: both are clinically accurate but there are differences

Objectives To assess clinically relevant difference in hepatic iron quantification using R2* relaxometry with (FS) and without (non-FS) fat saturation for the evaluation of patients with suspected hepatic iron overload. Methods We prospectively enrolled 134 patients who underwent 1.5-T MRI R2* relax...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020-11, Vol.30 (11), p.5826-5833
Hauptverfasser: Plaikner, M., Kremser, C., Zoller, H., Jaschke, W., Steurer, M., Viveiros, A., Henninger, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To assess clinically relevant difference in hepatic iron quantification using R2* relaxometry with (FS) and without (non-FS) fat saturation for the evaluation of patients with suspected hepatic iron overload. Methods We prospectively enrolled 134 patients who underwent 1.5-T MRI R2* relaxometry with FS and non-FS gradient echo sequences (12 echoes, initial TE = 0.99 ms). Proton density fat fraction for the quantification of steatosis was assessed. Linear regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots including Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient were performed for correlation of FS R2* with non-FS R2*. Patients were grouped into 4 severity classes of iron overload (EASL based), and agreement was evaluated by contingency tables and the proportion of overall agreement. Results A total of 41.8% of patients showed hepatic iron overload; 67.9% had concomitant steatosis; and 58.2% revealed no iron overload of whom 60.3% had steatosis. The mean R2* value for all FS data was 102.86 1/s, for non-FS 108.16 1/s. Linear regression resulted in an R -squared value of 0.99 ( p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-020-07010-5