Is dental panoramic tomography appropriate for all young adults because of third molars?
The purpose of this study was to determine, if a dental panoramic tomograph (DPT) is appropriate for every young adult due to third molars. The study sample consisted of 217 university students (20% men and 80% women; mean age 20.7 years; SD ± 0.6 years) and included a questionnaire about symptoms c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta odontologica Scandinavica 2021-01, Vol.79 (1), p.52-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this study was to determine, if a dental panoramic tomograph (DPT) is appropriate for every young adult due to third molars.
The study sample consisted of 217 university students (20% men and 80% women; mean age 20.7 years; SD ± 0.6 years) and included a questionnaire about symptoms caused by third molars, clinical oral examination of third molars, and a DPT. Subjects were divided into the following groups: subjects with a clinical indication for a DPT and subjects without such indication. The DPTs were then examined for findings regarding third molars.
Clinical indication for a DPT was observed in 64% of the subjects. Radiography revealed an additional 1.4% of the subjects with ≥1 radiographic signs of disease in relation to their third molars. Also, an additional 27% of the subjects had ≥1 other radiographic findings in relation to third molars that may have affected the clinical decision making.
In our study population, clinically undetectable pathology cannot be considered as an indication for a DPT. However, if prevailing clinical practice supports preventive removals and detecting or monitoring of unerupted third molars, a referral to DPT can be considered as good clinical practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-6357 1502-3850 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00016357.2020.1776384 |