Reliability and Validity of a Physical Activity Questionnaire for Indian Children and Adolescents
Background In low- and middle-income countries, sedentary behavior is widely prevalent in the young. Reliable and valid instruments are essential for evaluating sedentary behavior and physical activity in children and adolescents. Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of an easy to use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian pediatrics 2020-08, Vol.57 (8), p.707-711 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
In low- and middle-income countries, sedentary behavior is widely prevalent in the young. Reliable and valid instruments are essential for evaluating sedentary behavior and physical activity in children and adolescents.
Objective
To evaluate the reliability and validity of an easy to use physical activity questionnaire for children and adolescents from India.
Study design
Evaluation of a questionnaire tool.
Participants
104 children and adolescents belonging to the age group of 10–17 years were selected using a purposive sampling technique.
Methods
The Madras Diabetes Research Foundation — Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents [MPAQ(c)] was used to assess the various dimensions of physical activity. Physical activity was also objectively assessed using accelerometer worn around the waist for five complete days. The baseline administration of MPAQ(c) was done between November and December, 2017. Reliability of MPAQ was assessed by repeat administration after 2 weeks for upto a month later. Validity of MPAQ(c) was measured against accelerometer using Spearman’s correlation and Bland and Altman agreements.
Results
Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire revealed good agreement (ICC: 0.77 min/wk). Correlation coefficients (95% CI) for sedentary behavior and moderate to vigorous physical activity for MPAQ(c) against accelerometer were 0.52 (0.36, 0.64) and 0.41 (0.23, 0.55), respectively indicating moderate correlation. Good agreement was present between MPAQ(c) and accelerometer for sedentary behavior [mean bias = −4.9 (±2SD -197.1 to 187.3) min/d].
Conclusion
MPAQ(c) is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating physical activity in Indian children aged 10–17 years. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0019-6061 0974-7559 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13312-020-1912-9 |