Multicenter survey on mesalamine intolerance in patients with ulcerative colitis

Background and Aim Although oral mesalamine is the first‐choice drug for treating mild‐to‐moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), some patients show symptoms of intolerance, including exacerbation of diarrhea and abdominal pain. The present study clarified the current state and clinical courses of patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2021-01, Vol.36 (1), p.137-143
Hauptverfasser: Hiraoka, Sakiko, Fujiwara, Akiko, Toyokawa, Tatsuya, Higashi, Reiji, Moritou, Yuki, Takagi, Shinjiro, Matsueda, Kazuhiro, Suzuki, Seiyuu, Miyaike, Jiro, Inokuchi, Toshihiro, Takahara, Masahiro, Kato, Jun, Okada, Hiroyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aim Although oral mesalamine is the first‐choice drug for treating mild‐to‐moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), some patients show symptoms of intolerance, including exacerbation of diarrhea and abdominal pain. The present study clarified the current state and clinical courses of patients with mesalamine intolerance. Methods Patients who were diagnosed with UC and administered oral mesalamine at eight hospitals in Japan with a follow‐up period exceeding 1 year were analyzed. Results Sixty‐seven (11%) of 633 patients showed intolerance to at least one formulation of oral mesalamine. The frequency of mesalamine intolerance has increased in recent years, rising from 5.3% in 2007–2010 to 9.1% in 2011–2013 and 16.2% in 2014–2016. The most common complications were the exacerbation of diarrhea (n = 29), a fever (n = 25), and abdominal pain (n = 22). Readministration of mesalamine/sulfasalazine was attempted in 43 patients, mostly with other types of formulation of mesalamine, and more than half of these patients proved to be tolerant. The risk factors for mesalamine intolerance were female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–3.12), age 
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/jgh.15138