Screening the antifungal activities of monoterpenes and their isomers against Candida species
Aim Increasing the occurrence of non‐albicans Candida species with intrinsic or acquired resistance to antifungals as well as the emergence of multidrug Candida species coupled with the limited antifungal agents challenges the treatment of candidiasis. Consequently, a class of secondary metabolites...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied microbiology 2020-12, Vol.129 (6), p.1541-1551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
Increasing the occurrence of non‐albicans Candida species with intrinsic or acquired resistance to antifungals as well as the emergence of multidrug Candida species coupled with the limited antifungal agents challenges the treatment of candidiasis. Consequently, a class of secondary metabolites of plants exhibiting decent antifungal activity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the antifungal potential of various monoterpenes including Carvone, Limonene, Pinene, Menthone, Menthol, Camphor, Thujone, Citronellol, and Piperitone against standard and clinical isolates of Candida.
Methods and Results
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of compounds were determined, using the broth Microdilution method based on M27‐A3 protocol documented by clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI). Amongst the tested monoterpenes, oxygenated terpenoids showed strong antifungal activity. Specifically, alcoholic terpenoids such as (±)‐Citronellol possess more efficacy than the corresponding ketonic ones with MICs ranging from 0·03 to 2·00 μl ml−1 (0·16–10·80 mmol l−1). Among the examined yeasts, Candida tropicalis was the most susceptible species to (±)‐Citronellol. Moreover, the examined monoterpenes successfully inhibited the growth of fluconazole‐resistant Candida species. Moreover, statistical analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the (+) and (−) isomers, except for (±)‐α‐Pienene and (±) Menthone (ρ‐value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1364-5072 1365-2672 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jam.14740 |