Pes cavovarus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth compared to the idiopathic cavovarus foot: A preliminary weightbearing CT analysis

•Charcot-Marie-Tooth cavovarus exhibits increased supination compared to idiopathic forms.•It also presents with greater hindfoot varus malalignment compared to idiopathic forms.•Weightbearing 3D imaging may enable to detect subtle differences between different types of cavovarus. Pes cavovarus is a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot and ankle surgery 2021-02, Vol.27 (2), p.186-195
Hauptverfasser: Bernasconi, Alessio, Cooper, Lucy, Lyle, Shirley, Patel, Shelain, Cullen, Nicholas, Singh, Dishan, Welck, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Charcot-Marie-Tooth cavovarus exhibits increased supination compared to idiopathic forms.•It also presents with greater hindfoot varus malalignment compared to idiopathic forms.•Weightbearing 3D imaging may enable to detect subtle differences between different types of cavovarus. Pes cavovarus is a foot deformity that can be idiopathic (I-PC) or acquired secondary to other pathology. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common adult cause for acquired pes cavovarus deformity (CMT-PC). The foot morphology of these distinct patient groups has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study was to assess if morphological differences exist between CMT-PC, I-PC and normal feet (controls) using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). A retrospective analysis of WBCT scans performed between May 2013 and June 2017 was undertaken. WBCT scans from 17 CMT-PC, 17 I-PC and 17 healthy normally-aligned control feet (age-, side-, sex- and body mass index-matched) identified from a prospectively collected database, were analysed. Eight 2-dimensional (2D) and three 3-dimensional (3D) measurements were undertaken for each foot and mean values in the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction. Significant differences were observed between CMT-PC or I-PC and controls (p
ISSN:1268-7731
1460-9584
DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2020.04.004