Dimethyl fumarate vs Teriflunomide: an Italian time-to-event data analysis
Background The introduction of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) changed algorithms of RRMS treatment. Objectives To compare the effectiveness of treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide (TRF) in a large multicentre Italian coho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurology 2020-10, Vol.267 (10), p.3008-3020 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The introduction of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) changed algorithms of RRMS treatment.
Objectives
To compare the effectiveness of treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide (TRF) in a large multicentre Italian cohort of RRMS patients.
Materials and Methods
Patients with RRMS who received treatment with DMF and TRF between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2018 from twelve MS centers were identified. The events investigated were “time-to-first-relapse”, “time-to-Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging (MRI)-activity” and “time-to-disability-progression”.
Results
1445 patients were enrolled (1039 on DMF, 406 on TRF) and followed for a median of 34 months. Patients on TRF were older (43.5 ± 8.6 vs 38.8 ± 9.2 years), with a predominance of men and higher level of disability (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00415-020-09959-1 |